Poster's note : I thought I'd posted this but I can't find it. It's an
interesting economic analysis of moral hazard. (NB the claim about SRM not
affecting carbon cycle is likely to be refuted in near-term forthcoming
papers.) The sensitivity of SRM levels has implications for control systems
regimes (as discussed recently in eg the cybernetics paper)

http://www.nber.org/papers/w21355

Solar Geoengineering, Uncertainty, and the Price of Carbon
Garth Heutel, Juan Moreno Cruz, Soheil Shayegh
NBER Working Paper No. 21355
Issued in July 2015
NBER Program(s):   EEE   PE
We consider the socially optimal use of solar geoengineering to manage
climate change. Solar geoengineering can reduce damages from atmospheric
greenhouse gas concentrations, potentially more cheaply than reducing
emissions. If so, optimal policy includes less abatement than recommended
by models that ignore solar geoengineering, and the price of carbon is
lower. Solar geoengineering reduces temperature but does not reduce
atmospheric or ocean carbon concentrations, and that carbon may cause
damages apart from temperature increases. Finally, uncertainty over climate
change and solar geoengineering alters the optimal deployment of solar
geoengineering. We explore these issues with an analytical model and a
numerical simulation. The price of carbon is 30%-45% lower than the price
recommended in a model without geoengineering, depending on the
parameterizations of geoengineering costs and benefits. Carbon
concentrations are higher but temperature is lower when allowing for solar
geoengineering. The optimal amount of solar geoengineering is more
sensitive to climate uncertainty than is the optimal amount of abatement.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to