http://www.isa-sociology.org/forum-2016/rc/rc.php?n=RC02
Research Committee on Economy and Society, RC02 RC02 main page Program Coordinator Heidi GOTTFRIED, Wayne State University, USA, [email protected] Number of allocated sessions including Business Meeting: 16. Call for Abstracts 14 April 2015 - 30 September 2015 24:00 GMT Anyone interested in presenting a paper should submit an abstract on-line to a chosen session of RC/WG/TG on-line submissions The abstract (300 words) must be submitted in English, French or Spanish. Sessions in alphabetical order Climate Change, Capitalism, Geoengineering Session Organizer(s) J.P. SAPINSKI, University of Victoria, Canada, [email protected] Session in English It is now widely admitted that the global elite has failed to mitigate GHG emissions after nearly 25 years of international negotiations. In the last few years, a growing number of voices have started to advocate, albeit very reluctantly, that climate geoengineering needs to be seriously considered to avoid the most catastrophic consequences of global warming. Interest in the topic has grown rapidly, as numerous research initiatives have formed and mechanisms for a legitimate governance of geoengineering research and implementation are being actively sought. However, the critical voice of sociology and political economy is still marginal in this crucial discussion, and the context of capitalism’s reliance on fossil fuels to support unfettered capital accumulation is all but absent from debates. This session addresses many of the questions that are left out of the discussion, such as: What is the relationship between capitalism and climate geoengineering? Is geoengineering a necessary consequence of capitalism or can it be avoided in an ecologically modernized regime of ‘green’ capitalism? Where does geoengineering fit in capital accumulation circuits? Can it potentially function as a new source of corporate profit, or is it simply a desperate attempt at safeguarding the conditions of accumulation? Within a capitalist framework, what kind of governance arrangements would ensure that geoengineering truly serves to ‘buy more time’ to reduce emissions, and is not used as a spatio-temporal technological fix to allow GHG emissions to keep growing unabated? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
