To Olaf, I don't think it was Andrew's own statement that CCS is cheap and secure; he's posting a cut&paste of an abstract that is of interest just because CCS is geoengineering-related.
I do appreciate your cautions about CCS and am interested in the potential for natural processes to sequester CO2 with materials such as olivine. What is the most efficient means of achieving this sequestration in terms of the embodied energy of the process? Brian > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
