The below paper would appear to be instructive on this debate ; it may not
end as it begins

LETTER • OPEN ACCESS • IOPSELECT
<http://iopscience.iop.org/collections?collection_type=SELECT>
Atmospheric consequences of disruption of the ocean thermocline

Lester Kwiatkowski, Katharine L Ricke and Ken Caldeira

Published 19 March 2015 • © 2015 IOP Publishing Ltd
Environmental Research Letters <http://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1748-9326>
, Volume 10 <http://iopscience.iop.org/volume/1748-9326/10>,Number 3
<http://iopscience.iop.org/issue/1748-9326/10/3>
 Article PDF
<http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034016/pdf>

   -

   5398 Total downloads
   119 Video abstract views
   -

   Cited by 1 articles
   
<http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034016;jsessionid=D9BB39BD359369457DD8A62AE8F9C92B.ip-10-40-1-105#citations>
   - [image: Article has an altmetric score of 75]
   
<https://www.altmetric.com/details.php?domain=iopscience.iop.org&citation_id=3812746>
   - Turn on MathJax
   
<http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034016;jsessionid=D9BB39BD359369457DD8A62AE8F9C92B.ip-10-40-1-105#>
   -

   Share this article


   
<?subject=Atmospheric%20consequences%20of%20disruption%20of%20the%20ocean%20thermocline&body=Atmospheric%20consequences%20of%20disruption%20of%20the%20ocean%20thermocline%20-%20https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034016>
   
<http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034016>
   
<http://twitter.com/share?url=https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034016&text=Atmospheric%20consequences%20of%20disruption%20of%20the%20ocean%20thermocline&via=IOPscience>
   
<https://plus.google.com/share?url=https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034016>
   
<http://www.citeulike.org/posturl?url=https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034016>
   <http://www.mendeley.com/import/?doi=10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034016>

Article information
<http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034016;jsessionid=D9BB39BD359369457DD8A62AE8F9C92B.ip-10-40-1-105#>
Abstract

 Download video
<http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/10/3/034016/video/abstract>  Transcript
<http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/10/3/034016/media/abstract-transcript-510722-va.txt>

 View all Environ. Res. Lett. video abstracts
<http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/videoabstracts>

Technologies utilizing vertical ocean pipes have been proposed as a means
to avoid global warming, either by providing a source of clean energy,
increasing ocean carbon uptake, or storing thermal energy in the deep
ocean. However, increased vertical transport of water has the capacity to
drastically alter the ocean thermocline. To help bound potential climate
consequences of these activities, we perform a set of simulations involving
idealized disruption of the ocean thermocline by greatly increasing
vertical mixing in the upper ocean. We use an Earth System Model (ESM) to
evaluate the likely thermal and hydrological response of the atmosphere to
this scenario. In our model, increased vertical transport in the upper
ocean decreases upward shortwave and longwave radiation at the
top-of-the-atmosphere due primarily to loss of clouds and sea-ice over the
ocean. This extreme scenario causes an effective radiative forcing of
≈15.5–15.9 W m−2, with simulations behaving on multi-decadal time scales as
if they are approaching an equilibrium temperature ≈8.6–8.8 °C higher than
controls. Within a century, this produces higher global mean surface
temperatures than would have occurred in the absence of increased vertical
ocean transport. In our simulations, disruption of the thermocline strongly
cools the lower atmosphere over the ocean, resulting in high pressure
anomalies. The greater land-sea pressure contrast is found to increase
water vapour transport from ocean to land in the lower atmosphere and
therefore increase global mean precipitation minus evaporation (P–E) over
land; however, many high latitude regions and some low latitude regions
experience decreased P–E. Any real implementation of ocean pipe
technologies would damage the thermal structure of the ocean to a lesser
extent than simulated here; nevertheless, our simulations indicate the
likely sign and character of unintended atmospheric consequences of such
ocean technologies. Prolonged application of ocean pipe technologies,
rather than avoiding global warming, could exacerbate long-term warming of
the climate system.



On 4 May 2017 18:16, "Andrew Lockley" <[email protected]> wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "lou del bello" <[email protected]>
> Date: 4 May 2017 16:51
> Subject: Hi - New Scientist press enquiry
> To: "Andrew Lockley" <[email protected]>
> Cc:
>
> Hi Andrew
>
> I understand you manage the geoengineering list so I thought before
> posting I would just write you first, because my query is not specifically
> about geoengineering but might be of interest to some of the list's members.
>
> I am writing a story for the New Scientist which will cover the attached
> paper.
>
> The paper focuses on an Arctic site characterised by high methane flux
> from the seafloor. It observes that the methane, despite being a potent
> greenhouse gas, has the effect to take up CO2 at a higher rate than the
> surrounding waters, even offsetting the warming potential of the methane
> itself. This effect, according to the scientists, turns such sites into
> "carbon sinks".
>
> Can you think of someone who might be qualified and interested in
> commenting on the story? Ideally between tonight and tomorrow, i just need
> a quick Skype/phone chat.
>
>
> Many thanks!
>
>
>
> Lou
>
> --
> *Lou Del Bello*
>
> *Mobile UK +44 (0)7900632250 <+44%207900%20632250>*
> *Mobile Kenya +254 (0)14190244 *
>
> Multimedia journalist
>
> @loudelbello
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to