Veli Albert Kallio has shared a OneDrive file with you. To view it, click the 
link below.


<https://1drv.ms/b/s!AsDtkXiDzgyEhDwBww7yt5sF9HGm>
[https://r1.res.office365.com/owa/prem/images/dc-pdf_20.png]<https://1drv.ms/b/s!AsDtkXiDzgyEhDwBww7yt5sF9HGm>

Geoengineering Watch 
Monitoring.pdf<https://1drv.ms/b/s!AsDtkXiDzgyEhDwBww7yt5sF9HGm>



Dear Sirs,

RE: Thoughts on the Motivation on Spying of Geoengineering Researchers

Although I am just a very peripheral player in geoengineering research, and 
that I have hardly published anything on this particular field, and that it is 
just only couple of times I have posted into this geoengineering group (i.e. 
can you yourself recall me making posts in this group, perhaps ever?). Despite 
all the above it appears that an extensive monitoring operations about my 
communications and publications are now being carried out by Geoengineering 
Watch group - shown here by Academia.edu analysis website: see .pdf of web 
traffic analysis of my site.

It was a virtually unrelated article about melting Arctic that related to the 
evidence I was giving at the Houses of Parliament here in the UK, this April 
for Sea Research Society. If you read through 47 pages of my evidence I gave, 
you will come across just one solitary reference, a word 'geoengineering' 
research therein. Nevertheless, this one solitary reference to 'geoengineering 
research' in my Parliament evidence has drawn over dozen geoengineering queries 
by Geoengineering Watch group - an astounding achievement by them in monitoring 
me: 
https://www.academia.edu/33000316/MPs_to_review_UKs_role_in_Arctic_sustainability_-_24th_April_2017.docx
[http://a.academia-assets.com/images/open-graph-icons/fb-paper.gif]<https://www.academia.edu/33000316/MPs_to_review_UKs_role_in_Arctic_sustainability_-_24th_April_2017.docx>

MPs to review UK's role in Arctic sustainability - 24th April 
2017.docx<https://www.academia.edu/33000316/MPs_to_review_UKs_role_in_Arctic_sustainability_-_24th_April_2017.docx>
www.academia.edu
The draft paper as at 24th April which is being amended as the draft for the 
oral presentation session 5th April 2017 does not contain any references and 
text errors needed corrections. The paper is still being worked on with more 
sections being

I deliberate here on the possible motivations of "reasons why" and backers of 
those people who so actively monitor geoengineering researchers that their 
radar captures even mosquitoes like me (unless I have unknowingly become 
something of a geoengineering research giant without really noticing what I had 
invented)!!!

So what are the 'reasons why' and the backers of those people who are 
attempting to monitor geoengineering researchers and gather information about 
anything and everything even as small as just one solitary word reference to 
geoengineering in a fairly long 47-page Parliamentary evidence document? 
Several possibilities and motivations of these people and other similar groups 
are coming to my mind. These kind of extensive monitoring efforts almost 
certainly point to an indirect organised interests and perhaps utilitarian 
purposes to carry out (help) campaigns against geoengineering research and so 
to monitor the researchers meticulously.

My foremost thought here is that the very idea of someone researching or citing 
about geoengineering - even briefly - implies (indirectly) that there would be 
an evidence about changing climate which then justifies an investment in such a 
research (that threatens the interests of the patrons of the campaigns against 
geoengineering research). So, if geoengineering research can be refuted 
(killed), it means that there is also neither climate change and so no need to 
mitigate any such a climate change. Thus, by killing geoengineering research, 
"the Plan B", this would also kill all argument for any climate change 
happening in the first place.

According to BBC, during his election campaign, Donald Trump stated recently 
that climate change was 'a hoax' and, implicitly reconfirmed this by his 
announcement on Thursday, 1st June 2017, stating that the United States will 
now withdraw from the Paris Climate Change Agreement. President Trump has since 
avoided questions on the subject likewise his White House press secretary Sean 
Spicer.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40128026
[https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/cpsprodpb/7725/production/_96310503_trump2_afp976.jpg]<http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40128026>

Will Paris pull-out hurt Trump? - BBC 
News<http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40128026>
www.bbc.co.uk
These are external links and will open in a new window In the end the collected 
pressure from environmentalists, diplomats, major US corporations, foreign ...

I would like to have your reflections what you think about the motivations of 
those who want to stifle geoengineering? Do you think like I am starting to 
think that it is partly arising as a fear of admission of climate change 
happening in the first place. I just think that my Parliament evidence was very 
thin in geoengineering indeed and there seems to be a paranoia that even one 
single word justifies attack by a dozen or more people from the said 
organisation to peer through all 47 pages. Have you had experiences like this 
or any harassment as a geoengineering researcher? What do you think about my 
paper and how you see it relevant here?

Yours sincerely,

Veli Albert Kallio, FRGS
Vice President, Sea Research Society
Environmental Affairs Department

https://exploresrs.academia.edu/VeliKallio
Veli Albert Kallio | Sea Research Society - 
Academia.edu<https://exploresrs.academia.edu/VeliKallio>
exploresrs.academia.edu
Veli Albert Kallio, Sea Research Society, Environmental Affairs Department, 
Faculty Member. Studies Climate Change, Climatology, and Meteorology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Research_Society
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/af/Sea_Research_Society%27s_first_headquarters.jpg/220px-Sea_Research_Society%27s_first_headquarters.jpg]<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Research_Society>

Sea Research Society - 
Wikipedia<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Research_Society>
en.wikipedia.org
The Sea Research Society (SRS) is a non-profit educational research 
organization founded in 1972. Its general purpose is to promote scientific and 
educational ...







-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to