https://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/gmd-2017-168/

The Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDR-MIP):
Rationale and experimental design
David P. Keller1, Andrew Lenton2,3, Vivian Scott4, Naomi E. Vaughan5, Nico
Bauer6, Duoying Ji7, Chris D. Jones8, Ben Kravitz9, Helene Muri10, and
Kirsten Zickfeld111GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany
2CSIRO Oceans and Atmospheres, Hobart, Australia
3Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, Hobart,
Australia
4School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh
5Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Environmental
Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
6Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Research Domain Sustainable
Solutions, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
7College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal
University, Beijing, China
8Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
9Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
10Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
11Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University , Burnaby, Canada
Received: 11 Jul 2017 – Accepted for review: 16 Aug 2017 – Discussion
started: 17 Aug 2017
Abstract. The recent IPCC reports state that continued anthropogenic
greenhouse gas emissions are changing the climate threatening "severe,
pervasive and irreversible" impacts. Slow progress in emissions reduction
to mitigate climate change is resulting in increased attention on what is
called *Geoengineering*, *Climate Engineering*, or *Climate Intervention* –
deliberate interventions to counter climate change that seek to either
modify the Earth's radiation budget or remove greenhouse gases such as CO2 from
the atmosphere. When focused on CO2, the latter of these categories is
called Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR). The majority of future emission
scenarios that stay well below 2 °C, and nearly all emission scenarios that
do not exceed 1.5 °C warming by the year 2100, require some form of CDR. At
present, there is little consensus on the impacts and efficacy of the
different types of proposed CDR. To address this need the Carbon Dioxide
Removal Model Intercomparison Project (or CDR-MIP) was initiated. This
project brings together models of the Earth system in a common framework to
explore the potential, impacts, and challenges of CDR. Here, we describe
the first set of CDR-MIP experiments that are designed to address questions
concerning CDR-induced climate "reversibility", the response of the Earth
system to direct atmospheric CO2 removal (direct air capture and storage),
and the CDR potential and impacts of afforestation/reforestation, as well
as ocean alkalinization.

*Citation:* Keller, D. P., Lenton, A., Scott, V., Vaughan, N. E., Bauer,
N., Ji, D., Jones, C. D., Kravitz, B., Muri, H., and Zickfeld, K.: The
Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDR-MIP): Rationale
and experimental design, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss.,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-168, in review, 2017

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to