Bravo!! last year a friend and i proposed the use of salt to the same 
purpose..even wrote a message on this to members of the geoengineering 
group.. i hope this concept is pursued.

On Sunday, March 25, 2018 at 8:00:05 AM UTC-4, renaud.derichter wrote:
>
> http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/03/dusting-salt-could-cool-planet
> doi:10.1126/science.aat6555  
> A dusting of salt could cool the planet By Paul Voosen 
> Mar. 21, 2018 , 12:10 PM 
>
> *THE WOODLANDS, TEXAS—​*A last-ditch remedy for a climate disaster might 
> be waiting in your kitchen. If efforts to control greenhouse gases fail, 
> finely powdered salt spread through the upper troposphere could hold off 
> the sun's rays and cool the planet, researchers reported here today at the 
> Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. The approach could be more benign 
> than other schemes for putting a temporary hold on climate change.
>
> For several decades, scientists have suggested ways to “geoengineer” the 
> climate 
> <http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/01/us-should-pursue-controversial-geoengineering-research-federal-scientists-say-first>.
>  
> Several proposals call for injecting microscopic particles, called 
> aerosols, into the stratosphere, the quiet region of the atmosphere above 
> the troposphere about 18 kilometers up from the equator. There they reflect 
> sunlight back into space, mimicking the influence of large volcanic 
> eruptions that have temporarily cooled the planet in the past.
>
> Such proposals often involve sulfates, particles that form in the 
> stratosphere from sulfur dioxide ejected by volcanoes, or other molecules 
> with high reflectivity, such as diamond dust or alumina (aluminum oxide). 
> But all these approaches have drawbacks, says Robert Nelson, a senior 
> scientist at the Planetary Science Institute who is based in Pasadena, 
> California. Sulfur dioxide, for example, could eat away at the ozone layer 
> or cause acid rain.
>
> Alumina could be even worse, Nelson says. Although it is extremely 
> reflective, it could embed in the lungs if inhaled and cause chronic 
> disease similar to silicosis. “I was raised in Pittsburgh, 
> [Pennsylvania,] and I remember as a child seeing black lung victims 
> struggling to get down the street.” Still, given the limited amount of 
> alumina that could be required, it’s far from certain such a health risk 
> would be a genuine concern.
>
> So Nelson continued to look for other reflective compounds that might be 
> less hazardous to human health. In 2015, he was studying evaporated salts 
> on the surface of other solar system bodies such as the dwarf planet Ceres 
> <http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/12/dwarf-planet-ceres-may-harbor-clouds-water-ice>.
>  
> He soon realized that simple table salt is more reflective than alumina, 
> while also harmless to humans. Just as important, Nelson believes that 
> salt, when ground into small enough particles of the right shape and 
> dispersed randomly, would not block outgoing infrared heat released by 
> Earth, adding to its cooling effect 
> <https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2018/pdf/1834.pdf>.
>
> Nelson is not the first to consider salt, says Matthew Watson, a 
> volcanologist at the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Watson 
> led a geoengineering experiment, called the Stratospheric Particle 
> Injection for Climate Engineering project, that was canceled in 2012. His 
> group briefly considered salt for stratospheric injection, he says, but 
> problems popped up.
>
> First, there's a lot of chlorine in salt, and chlorine can contribute to 
> destroying ozone. That alone could be enough to kill salt as a candidate, 
> Watson says. Few would likely welcome injecting a particle that could 
> reopen the ozone hole. "[This] could be a big problem," agrees David Keith, 
> an energy and climate scientist focused on geoengineering at Harvard 
> University. Salt is also highly attracted to water, and water is scant 
> enough in the stratosphere that injecting even limited amounts of salt 
> could potentially alter, for example, the formation of the realm’s wispy 
> clouds, to unknown effects.
>
> Nelson hopes these concerns could be addressed by injecting salt in the 
> high troposphere, above the clouds but below the stratosphere. He 
> also plans to look more closely at salt's properties; if he can resolve 
> some of these questions, he'd like to see a test of the particles above a 
> region forecasted to experience life-threatening extreme temperatures. This 
> would test the science while potentially benefiting society in the short 
> term, he says. Such a research effort could only come after thorough 
> engagement with the public, Nelson adds.
>
> But like nearly all scientists interested in geoengineering, Nelson 
> stresses that the strategy is no substitute for action to curb carbon 
> emissions. No type of solar radiation management, for example, would 
> prevent rising carbon dioxide from acidifying the oceans. This research 
> should only be done so the world can potentially buy itself some time, 
> Nelson says. “This would be a palliative, not a [long-term] solution.”
>
> **Correction, 21 March, 1:50 p.m.: This story was updated to clarify that 
> Nelson seeks to inject in the upper troposphere, not the stratosphere, as 
> previously stated.*
> Posted in: 
>    
>    - Chemistry <http://www.sciencemag.org/category/chemistry>
>    - Climate <http://www.sciencemag.org/category/climate>
>
> doi:10.1126/science.aat6555
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Attachment: EnhancingSolar - revised.docx
Description: MS-Word 2007 document

Reply via email to