Hadn't heard this.....yes, this would indeed be geoengineering (of weather,
with unintended climate consequences).....it just gets crazier and
crazier.....


<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 1:35 AM Andrew Lockley <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Poster's note: obliquely relevant as MCB is potentially able to influence
> hurricanes
>
> Axios: Trump suggested dropping nuclear bombs into hurricanes to stop them
> from hitting the U.S..
>
> https://www.axios.com/trump-nuclear-bombs-hurricanes-97231f38-2394-4120-a3fa-8c9cf0e3f51c.html
>
> Scoop: Trump suggested nuking hurricanes to stop them from hitting U.S.[image:
> Illustration of Trump pressing nuclear button]
> Illustration: Lazaro Gamio/Axios
>
> President Trump has suggested multiple times to senior Homeland Security
> and national security officials that they explore using nuclear bombs to
> stop hurricanes from hitting the United States, according to sources who
> have heard the president's private remarks and been briefed on a National
> Security Council memorandum that recorded those comments.
>
> Behind the scenes: During one hurricane briefing at the White House,
> Trump said, "I got it. I got it. Why don't we nuke them?" according to one
> source who was there. "They start forming off the coast of Africa, as
> they're moving across the Atlantic, we drop a bomb inside the eye of the
> hurricane and it disrupts it. Why can't we do that?" the source added,
> paraphrasing the president's remarks.
>
>    - Asked how the briefer reacted, the source recalled he said something
>    to the effect of, "Sir, we'll look into that."
>    - Trump replied by asking incredulously how many hurricanes the U.S.
>    could handle and reiterating his suggestion that the government intervene
>    before they make landfall.
>    - The briefer "was knocked back on his heels," the source in the room
>    added. "You could hear a gnat fart in that meeting. People were astonished.
>    After the meeting ended, we thought, 'What the f---? What do we do with
>    this?'"
>
> Trump also raised the idea in another conversation with a senior
> administration official. A 2017 NSC memo describes that second
> conversation, in which Trump asked whether the administration should bomb
> hurricanes to stop them from hitting the homeland. A source briefed on the
> NSC memo said it does not contain the word "nuclear"; it just says the
> president talked about bombing hurricanes.
>
>    - The source added that this NSC memo captured "multiple topics, not
>    just hurricanes. … It wasn't that somebody was so terrified of the bombing
>    idea that they wrote it down. They just captured the president’s comments."
>    - The sources said that Trump's "bomb the hurricanes" idea — which he
>    floated early in the first year and a bit of his presidency before John
>    Bolton took over as national security adviser — went nowhere and never
>    entered a formal policy process.
>
> White House response: A senior administration official said, "We don't
> comment on private discussions that the president may or may not have had
> with his national security team."
>
>    - A different senior administration official, who has been briefed on
>    the president's hurricane bombing suggestion, defended Trump's idea and
>    said it was no cause for alarm. "His goal — to keep a catastrophic
>    hurricane from hitting the mainland — is not bad," the official said. "His
>    objective is not bad."
>    - "What people near the president do is they say 'I love a president
>    who asks questions like that, who’s willing to ask tough questions.' ... It
>    takes strong people to respond to him in the right way when stuff like this
>    comes up. For me, alarm bells weren't going off when I heard about it, but
>    I did think somebody is going to use this to feed into 'the president is
>    crazy' narrative."
>
> The big picture: Trump didn't invent this idea. The notion that
> detonating a nuclear bomb over the eye of a hurricane could be used to
> counteract convection currents dates to the Eisenhower era, when it was
> floated by a government scientist.
>
>    - The idea keeps resurfacing in the public even though scientists
>    agree it won't work. The myth has been so persistent that the National
>    Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. government agency that
>    predicts changes in weather and the oceans, published an online fact
>    sheet for the public <https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/C5c.html> under
>    the heading "Tropical Cyclone Myths Page."
>    - The page states: "Apart from the fact that this might not even alter
>    the storm, this approach neglects the problem that the released radioactive
>    fallout would fairly quickly move with the tradewinds to affect land areas
>    and cause devastating environmental problems. Needless to say, this is not
>    a good idea."
>
> About 3 weeks after Trump's 2016 election, National Geographic published
> <https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2016/11/hurricanes-weather-history-nuclear-weapons/>
>  an
> article titled, "Nuking Hurricanes: The Surprising History of a Really Bad
> Idea." It found, among other problems, that:
>
>    - Dropping a nuclear bomb into a hurricane would be banned under the
>    terms of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty between the U.S. and the
>    former Soviet Union. So that could stave off any experiments, as long as
>    the U.S. observes the terms of the treaty.
>
> Atlantic hurricane season runs until Nov. 30.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-04XLOrj8p%3DQ%3DK0Y7_q0G%2B2F7aPaX0jy%2B-v_yW4E1jG5xA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-04XLOrj8p%3DQ%3DK0Y7_q0G%2B2F7aPaX0jy%2B-v_yW4E1jG5xA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CA%2BPtSAMJYDzP6xgacfGDn1Vk4Jv%2BfjrPV19k%2B%2BZ_NSRr1S_5hQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to