https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694220?journalCode=fcri20

A mission-driven research program on solar geoengineering could promote
justice and legitimacy
David R. Morrow
Published online: 22 Nov 2019
Download citation
https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694220

ABSTRACT
Over the past decade or so, several commentators have called for
mission-driven research programs on solar geoengineering, also known as
solar radiation management (SRM) or climate engineering. Building on the
largely epistemic reasons offered by earlier commentators, this paper
argues that a well-designed mission-driven research program that aims to
evaluate solar geoengineering could promote justice and legitimacy, among
other valuable ends. Specifically, an international, mission-driven
research program that aims to produce knowledge to enable well-informed
decision-making about solar geoengineering could (1) provide a more
effective way to identify and answer the questions that policymakers would
need to answer; and (2) provide a venue for more efficient, effective,
just, and legitimate governance of solar geoengineering research; while (3)
reducing the tendency for solar geoengineering research to exacerbate
international domination. Thus, despite some risks and limitations, a
well-designed mission-driven research program offers one way to improve the
governance of solar geoengineering research relative to the
‘investigator-driven’ status quo.

KEYWORDS: Solar geoengineering, solar radiation management, climate
engineering, climate intervention, justice, legitimacy, ethics, research

David R. Morrow is Director of Research for the Forum for Climate
Engineering Assessment at American University and a Research Fellow with
the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy at George Mason University.
He writes on normative issues in climate policy. His work on the ethics and
governance of solar geoengineering has appeared in venues such as Ethics,
Policy & Environment, Public Affairs Quarterly, Climatic Change,
Environmental Research Letters, and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society A. His most recent book, Values in Climate Policy, was published in
2019.

Acknowledgments
Thanks to Zach Dove for a helpful discussion of these ideas, and to
Catriona McKinnon and Steve Gardiner for helpful critical comments. The
positions taken in this paper represent the author’s own views, and not
those of the Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment.

Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-07aByhBxHVcvio5KGGKO55_5MYYk%3DVdA4OmucO%3DXXyUcw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to