Andrew beat me to the punch posting this (thanks, Andrew!), but the following link will allow up to 50 people to tunnel under the paywall:
https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/Q6W8X8H4JG5BJUN8KRTW/full?target=10.1080/13698230.2020.1694220 David On Friday, November 22, 2019 at 12:43:39 PM UTC-5, Andrew Lockley wrote: > > > > https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694220?journalCode=fcri20 > > A mission-driven research program on solar geoengineering could promote > justice and legitimacy > David R. Morrow > Published online: 22 Nov 2019 > Download citation > https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694220 > > ABSTRACT > Over the past decade or so, several commentators have called for > mission-driven research programs on solar geoengineering, also known as > solar radiation management (SRM) or climate engineering. Building on the > largely epistemic reasons offered by earlier commentators, this paper > argues that a well-designed mission-driven research program that aims to > evaluate solar geoengineering could promote justice and legitimacy, among > other valuable ends. Specifically, an international, mission-driven > research program that aims to produce knowledge to enable well-informed > decision-making about solar geoengineering could (1) provide a more > effective way to identify and answer the questions that policymakers would > need to answer; and (2) provide a venue for more efficient, effective, > just, and legitimate governance of solar geoengineering research; while (3) > reducing the tendency for solar geoengineering research to exacerbate > international domination. Thus, despite some risks and limitations, a > well-designed mission-driven research program offers one way to improve the > governance of solar geoengineering research relative to the > ‘investigator-driven’ status quo. > > KEYWORDS: Solar geoengineering, solar radiation management, climate > engineering, climate intervention, justice, legitimacy, ethics, research > > David R. Morrow is Director of Research for the Forum for Climate > Engineering Assessment at American University and a Research Fellow with > the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy at George Mason University. > He writes on normative issues in climate policy. His work on the ethics and > governance of solar geoengineering has appeared in venues such as Ethics, > Policy & Environment, Public Affairs Quarterly, Climatic Change, > Environmental Research Letters, and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal > Society A. His most recent book, Values in Climate Policy, was published in > 2019. > > Acknowledgments > Thanks to Zach Dove for a helpful discussion of these ideas, and to > Catriona McKinnon and Steve Gardiner for helpful critical comments. The > positions taken in this paper represent the author’s own views, and not > those of the Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment. > > Disclosure statement > No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author. > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/7f1626b6-d544-4416-931e-3e9450f8c094%40googlegroups.com.
