Adrian – your list of ostensibly viable should include SAI too, as was pointed 
out earlier on this same thread.  In principle one could inject SO2 or other in 
the spring at high latitude (and indeed, that may be the most economically 
viable, technologically achievable near-term approach – and to be clear I 
wouldn’t advocate doing anything simply because it’s cheap, simply pointing it 
out).  Re MCB, I don’t know if there are sufficient susceptible clouds at high 
latitudes to do something focused on the Arctic, vs using it to cool lower 
latitudes and thus cool the Arctic by reducing heat transport – which, of 
course, if your sole metric is freezing the Arctic, would work.   For any of 
these things one has to look at all of the impacts, and the science is still 
pretty immature beyond recognizing the overall ability to cool.

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On 
Behalf Of Adrian Hindes
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 6:37 PM
To: geoengineering <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [geo] THE COOLING CONUNDRUM REVERSING CLIMATE CHANGE TO REFREEZE 
THE ARCTIC

Ah of course, the straightforward thermodynamics of it aren't favourable to 
direct cooling through refrigeration.

I suppose the only way to make it work would be to transfer the heat to outer 
space or deep underground. I don't know too much about how heat exchangers or 
thermal transport works, but having a read of the basal freezing section of 
your paper, Andrew, I can't imagine anything thermosyphon related would be 
appropriate for the Arctic.

Aside from glass microspheres then, maybe only marine cloud brightening remains 
as an ostensibly viable Arctic refreeze technology? It'll be interesting to see 
what they discuss in the Climate Emergency Summit talk.
-A
On Sunday, 7 February 2021 at 7:43:10 am UTC+11 Andrew Lockley wrote:
I'm unclear on the proposed mechanism, but any artificial refrigeration simply 
moves heat around. There is obviously an energy penalty for doing this - and 
for generating the electricity, in the first place. In short, all the 
additional thermal energy from the nuclear power plant will ultimately end up 
as waste heat, in the system you're trying to cool. You can't make a sealed 
room colder by locking a generator and refrigerator in it - even if that room 
is the size of a planet. Only by using energy to Accelerate hear transfer to 
space can anything be achieved. Pumping water through the ice can do this, as 
can freezing glacier bases to preserve them and their ice-albedo feedback. .

I address some of these issues in my recent paper.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927820300940

On Sat, 6 Feb 2021, 07:54 Adrian Hindes, <[email protected]> wrote:
@Oliver although that's quite a few nuclear power plants, that's actually not 
so far out of the realm of possibility.
On Friday, 5 February 2021 at 11:48:12 am UTC+11 Oliver Wingenter wrote:
It would take 20 nuclear power plants running conventional refrigeration  to 
cool the Arctic Ocean.and refreeze it.

[https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/IAkhl6EbYbQYD9J_1Dc6N_HPU5Z488DnGcKcnWpOKuYmchAYVxkuaNLcLza-a4lma2s9ti4CdivC6ngcOg6DxsKIfQSj1jUPE23T-RPW6SSIBxsEZEVz9o7f4AeRul4zwq6JNmxjsa05TVZzHfERYYI-=s0-d-e1-ft#https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif]<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free. 
www.avast.com<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 3:10 PM Andrew Lockley 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

https://climateemergencysummit.org/the-cooling-conundrum-event-profile/

THE COOLING CONUNDRUM
REVERSING CLIMATE CHANGE TO REFREEZE THE ARCTIC
With rapidly rising global temperatures, the harm to people and nature is 
already too great. Signs that we are on the brink of triggering runaway global 
warming are increasing by the day, as the strain on major ecosystems reaches a 
new level of stress. Analysis shows that even a zero-emission pathway will not 
be enough alone to slow warming and avoid further devastation. This points to 
an urgent need to consider establishing an immediate way to cool the planet. Is 
reversing climate change a real possibility? What would it take to refreeze the 
Arctic and Antarctic ice to repair the climate?

David Keith – Professor of Applied Physics, Harvard
Ye Tao – Principal Investigator, Rowland Institute at Harvard
Holly Jean Buck – Science Writer & Analyst
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-06JsW0OtEti5ZfcnPe9%2BM43bB4EEa4p-PRvhr7VVdz3XA%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-06JsW0OtEti5ZfcnPe9%2BM43bB4EEa4p-PRvhr7VVdz3XA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/1d332f63-84f7-42cb-91d4-afc4fa71593bn%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/1d332f63-84f7-42cb-91d4-afc4fa71593bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/b7cd0c76-abfb-4e6d-a841-b2139ca396f5n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/b7cd0c76-abfb-4e6d-a841-b2139ca396f5n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CH2PR04MB6936CB5C29432480E24384D88F8E9%40CH2PR04MB6936.namprd04.prod.outlook.com.

Reply via email to