I could point to a number of vaguely-incoherent (or simply factually untrue) 
statements in here, but there’s one in particular that I haven’t the foggiest 
clue what it means:

“Unfortunately while the topics of investigation have been defined by Southern 
partners, the models, norms, and practices applied in DECIMALS remain primarily 
those of the dominant Northern research community.”


-          If “models” refers to the climate models used, well that’s true for 
climate change research too, so does that mean that all climate change research 
should cease until the South codes the exact same equations in the exact same 
programming languages?  Do we expect different answers if the equations are 
turned into computer code by someone from a different country?

-          Are the “norms and practices” intended to refer to things like 
writing papers that pass peer review?

I’m truly baffled by this sentence… would love to have someone shed some light 
on it.

doug

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On 
Behalf Of Geoeng Info
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 9:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [geo] The politics and governance of research into solar geoengineering

Publication link -> https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcc.707

Abstract
Research into solar geoengineering, far from being societally neutral, is 
already highly intertwined with its emerging politics. This review outlines 
ways in which research conditions or constructs solar geoengineering in diverse 
ways, including the forms of possible material technologies of solar 
geoengineering; the criteria and targets for their assessment; the scenarios in 
which they might be deployed; the publics which may support or oppose them; 
their political implications for other climate responses, and the international 
relations, governance mechanisms, and configurations of power that are presumed 
in order to regulate them. The review also examines proposals for governance of 
research, including suggested frameworks, principles, procedures, and 
institutions. It critically assesses these proposals, revealing their 
limitations given the context of the conditioning effects of current research. 
The review particularly highlights problems of the reproduction of Northern 
norms, instrumental approaches to public engagement, a weak embrace of 
precaution, and a persistent—but questionable—separation of research from 
deployment. It details complexities inherent in effective research governance 
which contribute to making the pursuit of solar geoengineering risky, 
controversial, and ethically contentious. In conclusion, it suggests a case for 
an explicit, reflexive research governance regime developed with international 
participation. It suggests that such a regime should encompass modeling and 
social science, as well as field experimentation, and must address not only 
technical and environmental, but also the emergent social and political, 
implications of research.

This article is categorized under:
Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Knowledge and Practice
Policy and Governance > Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance

Duncan McLaren; Olaf Corry.
First published: 14 March 2021 . DOI<https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.707>
Edited by: Mike Hulme, Editor‐in‐Chief
Funding information: Det Frie Forskningsråd, Grant/Award Number: 116716

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAKSzgpZ%3DpMroc6Wp-rgnf0cQKF23%2BYFZSjLaRVM2K%3Dv%3DrHwQoQ%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAKSzgpZ%3DpMroc6Wp-rgnf0cQKF23%2BYFZSjLaRVM2K%3Dv%3DrHwQoQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CH2PR04MB69367324C77442E9352CB9698F7D9%40CH2PR04MB6936.namprd04.prod.outlook.com.

Reply via email to