https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01724-2

It is dangerous to normalize solar geoengineering research
Frank Biermann

We disagree with your view that research into solar geoengineering as a
means to cool the planet should be given “a chance” (*Nature* 593, 167; 2021
<https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01243-0>).

Your position aligns with those who seek to validate such research as a
potential climate-policy option (see go.nature.com/3jfqrbr). However, much
climate-governance scholarship opposes these untested technologies as a
dangerous distraction from decarbonization policies.

Many social scientists argue that democratic and fair global governance of
solar geoengineering is unattainable. Any future use of the approach would
require complex decisions at a planetary scale on where, how and for how
long it would be deployed, and on who would take responsibility for any
harm caused.

In our view, the current world order is unfit to devise and implement such
far-reaching agreements on planetary management. In the absence of
effective global control, the geopolitics of solar geoengineering would be
complex and frightening.

We call on our governments and funding agencies to halt the normalization
of research into planetary solar-geoengineering technologies.
Decarbonization of our economies is feasible if the right steps are taken.
Solar geoengineering is neither necessary nor desirable. A global
moratorium is needed.

*Nature* 595, 30 (2021)

*doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01724-2
<https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01724-2>*

A full list of co-signatories to this letter appears in Supplementary
Information.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

   1. List of co-signatories
   <https://www.nature.com/magazine-assets/d41586-021-01724-2/19292534>

COMPETING INTERESTS

The author declares no competing interests.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAKSzgpZ4Z6zQ0gGoSBxCfkf4FnkfoDFKzv4fOWjyQeN2ZH-3sw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to