I would doubt that there is enough HCl in the atmosphere to make this a
significant contributor to the overall CO2 imbalance.

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:29 AM Greg Rau <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2HCl + CaCO3 ---> CaCl2 + CO2 + H2O.   How is this a good thing for GHGs
> and GW?
> Greg
>
> On Monday, August 2, 2021, 03:52:35 PM PDT, Geoeng Info <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00151
>
> Heterogeneous Reactivity of HCl on CaCO3 Aerosols at Stratospheric
> Temperature
>
>
>    - Han N. Huynh and
>    - V. Faye McNeill
>    -
>    -
>    -
>    -
>    - *Abstract*
>
> Recently proposed as a possible alternative to sulfate particles for
> stratospheric solar radiation management (SSRM), calcite (CaCO3) aerosols
> have been modeled to have minimal negative impact on both stratospheric
> ozone level, through heterogeneous chemistry, and stratospheric
> temperature. However, the heterogeneous chemistry of CaCO3 aerosols with
> relevant trace gases, such as HCl, at stratospheric conditions is still
> underexamined. We studied the kinetics of HCl uptake on airborne CaCO3
> aerosols at stratospheric temperature, 207 ± 3 K, by performing experiments
> under dry conditions using an aerosol flow tube coupled with a custom-built
> quadrupole chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS) for HCl detection.
> The reactive uptake coefficient for HCl was measured to be 0.076 ± 0.009.
> This exceeds the reactive uptake coefficient of 0.013 ± 0.001 that we
> previously reported for this system at 296 K, consistent with the expected
> negative temperature dependence of gas uptake on solid surfaces. This
> finding suggests an initial strong reactive uptake of HCl gas on CaCO3
> aerosol surfaces in the stratosphere
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAKSzgpaROQJnv3ZD0ZqfMcZzegkw492mxCUktv_nnQEN3MLRGA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAKSzgpaROQJnv3ZD0ZqfMcZzegkw492mxCUktv_nnQEN3MLRGA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/146902550.2022050.1627946808075%40mail.yahoo.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/146902550.2022050.1627946808075%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAE%3DUieymn9iSFu%2BHVS%3Dnse0WXbKnz9pC3MRf0jY0mSprqm8Rbw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to