New study on PNAS (PS: also an interesting funny reading *Is Santa’s sleigh zero carbon? The answer lies in reindeer poo* https://theconversation.com/is-santas-sleigh-zero-carbon-the-answer-lies-in-reindeer-poo-173800 ). Season's greetings to all the CDR group. Rewilding the Arctic with mammals likely to be ineffective in slowing climate change impact *phys.org*/news/2021-12-rewilding-arctic-mammals-ineffective-climate.html <https://phys.org/news/2021-12-rewilding-arctic-mammals-ineffective-climate.html?utm_source=nwletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-nwletter> <https://phys.org/archive/20-12-2021/>
December 20, 2021 by University of Southampton <http://www.soton.ac.uk/> A new study has shed new light on why large mammals died out at the end of the ice age, suggesting their extinction was caused by a warming climate and expansion of vegetation that created unsuitable habitat for the animals. The findings, published in the journal *PNAS*, have major implications for proposals to prevent the soils in the Arctic today from thawing by re-introducing animals such as bison and horses. About 14,000 years ago, at the end of the last ice age, open, grassy landscapes that had extended eastwards from France across the now submerged Bering Sea all the way to the Yukon in Canada were transformed by the rapid spread of shrubs. At the same time, several iconic mammal species that inhabited what is now Alaska and the Yukon, such as the woolly mammoth <https://phys.org/tags/woolly+mammoth/>, became extinct, and archaeology records human presence <https://phys.org/tags/human+presence/> in the region. These ancient coincidences have led to the suggestion that human hunting caused the demise of the mammals, and their loss led to the shrub <https://phys.org/tags/shrub/> expansion, as they were not there to trample down the vegetation and put nutrients back into the soil. Today, with strong arctic warming, shrubs are spreading even further north into tundra regions. It is now popular to advocate that a form of rewilding—where animals <https://phys.org/tags/animals/> are returned to their original ecosystems to restore more "natural" conditions—might reverse the trend of increasing shrub cover, with possible benefit of keeping carbon stored in the ground. This is because low-growing vegetation exposes the ground to colder conditions than shrub cover does, and thus the ground and the carbon it contains remain well frozen. Others advocate that climate change drove the vegetation and landscape changes, and these led to the loss of the animals as their habitat disappeared. To test these alternative hypotheses, an international research team examined records of fossil pollen preserved in lake sediments across Alaska and Yukon for thousands of years. By focussing on records that met strict dating criteria the team could accurately pinpoint the timing of shrub expansion across this region. They then compared this with how the numbers of radiocarbon-dated bones from horse, bison, mammoth and moose changed through time—which provided them with an estimate of their changing population sizes. Their results showed that willow and birch shrubs began to expand across Alaska and Yukon around 14,000 years ago, when records of dated bones indicate that large grazing mammals were still abundant on the landscape. "Our study uses a clear predictive test to assess two opposing hypotheses about large animals in ancient and modern tundra ecosystems: that the animals disappeared before the shrubs increased, or that the shrubs increased before the animals disappeared," said Professor Mary Edwards of the University of Southampton who was part of the study team. Dr. Ali Monteath, the lead author from the Universities of Alberta and Southampton, adds "The results support the idea that at the end of the last ice age a major shift to warmer and wetter conditions transformed the landscape in a way that was highly unfavorable to the animals, including mammoths". The findings suggest that climate change <https://phys.org/tags/climate+change/> was the primary controller of northern ecosystems and that the large herbivores were not able to maintain their environment as the shrubs spread. "While humans may have compounded population declines, our results suggest climate-driven vegetation change was the primary reason the mammals disappeared," added Professor Edwards. Returning to the concept of rewilding the North with large mammals <https://phys.org/tags/large+mammals/> that are currently absent from the region, the research team concludes that this would probably not transform the vegetation over large areas and so do little to curtail release of carbon from the Arctic permafrost. Study co-author Professor Duane Froese of the University of Alberta said: "Rewilding experiments at the scale of local paddocks, as has been done for example at Pleistocene Park (NE Siberia), show that megaherbivores can alter their environment, drive changes in vegetation and even cool soil temperature, but these animal densities are much higher than we would expect for Pleistocene ecosystems. Our study shows that the effect of megafauna grazing is small at sub-continental scales even with the presence of mammoths, and climate, once again, is the main driver of these systems." Benjamin Gaglioti of the University of Alaska-Fairbanks added: "The hypothesis that reintroducing megafauna will prevent or slow warming-driven permafrost thaw and vegetation change in the Arctic has been bolstered by the idea that Pleistocene megafauna were instrumental in maintaining ice age ecosystems. In contrast to this prediction, our results show that high-latitude ecosystems responded sensitively to past warming events, even though megafauna were abundant on the landscape. These results lend support to the hypothesis that reintroducing megafauna today will do little to desensitize high latitude ecosystems to human driven warming." *More information:* Late Pleistocene shrub expansion preceded megafauna turnover and extinctions in eastern Beringia, *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences* (2021). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2107977118 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2107977118>. Le lun. 27 janv. 2020 à 18:10, Andrew Lockley <[email protected]> a écrit : > Poster's note: Cross posting, due to the albedo and Carbon storage > dimensions > > https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2019.0122 > > Pleistocene Arctic megafaunal ecological engineering as a natural climate > solution? > Marc Macias-Fauria, Paul Jepson, Nikita Zimov and Yadvinder Malhi > Published:27 January 2020https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0122 > Abstract > Natural climate solutions (NCS) in the Arctic hold the potential to be > implemented at a scale able to substantially affect the global climate. The > strong feedbacks between carbon-rich permafrost, climate and herbivory > suggest an NCS consisting of reverting the current wet/moist moss and > shrub-dominated tundra and the sparse forest–tundra ecotone to grassland > through a guild of large herbivores. Grassland-dominated systems might > delay permafrost thaw and reduce carbon emissions—especially in Yedoma > regions, while increasing carbon capture through increased productivity and > grass and forb deep root systems. Here we review the environmental context > of megafaunal ecological engineering in the Arctic; explore the mechanisms > through which it can help mitigate climate change; and estimate its > potential—based on bison and horse, with the aim of evaluating the > feasibility of generating an ecosystem shift that is economically viable in > terms of carbon benefits and of sufficient scale to play a significant role > in global climate change mitigation. Assuming a megafaunal-driven ecosystem > shift we find support for a megafauna-based arctic NCS yielding substantial > income in carbon markets. However, scaling up such projects to have a > significant effect on the global climate is challenging given the large > number of animals required over a short period of time. A first-cut > business plan is presented based on practical information—costs and > infrastructure—from Pleistocene Park (northeastern Yakutia, Russia). A 10 > yr experimental phase incorporating three separate introductions of herds > of approximately 1000 individuals each is costed at US$114 million, with > potential returns of approximately 0.3–0.4% yr−1 towards the end of the > period, and greater than 1% yr−1 after it. Institutional friction and the > potential role of new technologies in the reintroductions are discussed. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Carbon Dioxide Removal" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/CarbonDioxideRemoval/CAJ3C-04YPqxfKgCVT8jpxZp4-3-66Stq38BbUkXfLr9g5iEDWQ%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/CarbonDioxideRemoval/CAJ3C-04YPqxfKgCVT8jpxZp4-3-66Stq38BbUkXfLr9g5iEDWQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHodn99mC9xEytpN%3DNL0Ay6XVotJzSD_fC3aUNECLe0NLH%3D%2BiQ%40mail.gmail.com.
