Robert-
SRM is a logical top priority. 
Who will pay for it?
How will those doing it avoid assassination? (Moral or physical)

Peter 
Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 2, 2022, at 6:50 PM, Robbie Tulip <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Peter
> To answer your question, carbon  capture can collect CO2 to transform it into 
> stable valuable commodities. But CO2 storage is wrong and useless for climate 
> restoration. Chemical and photosynthetic use of CO2 as feedstock to produce 
> biomass and materials needs to replace the CCS paradigm. First though we need 
> to increase albedo as the emergency security response against extreme weather.
> Regards 
> Robert 🌷 
> 
>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 1:54 am, Peter Fiekowsky <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Ye- 
>> What does carbon capture have to do with climate restoration?
>> Carbon capture is for enhanced oil recovery and for selling expensive carbon 
>> offsets.
>> 
>> We're interested in carbon sequestration at the 50 Gt/year scale, such as 
>> with synthetic limestone, plankton, kelp.
>> Peter
>> 
>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 12:59 AM Ye Tao <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> No Peter, this is not argument for restoring CO2 below 300ppm; lack of a 
>>>> logical connection notwithstanding, carbon capture at scale simply 
>>>> infeasible before we are all fried. 
>>>> 
>>>> Ye
>>>> 
>>> On 3/1/2022 9:15 PM, Peter Fiekowsky wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>> Interesting. I remember that Michael Mann wrote a Scientific American 
>>>> article about 1999, telling us to expect 0.5C warming when we eliminate 
>>>> the sulfates. We knew it would happen, and it's happening. Maybe it's not 
>>>> so shocking.
>>>> 
>>>> Does anyone know how much sulfates still come from coal plants? Back in 
>>>> 1999 that was the big source, I think.
>>>> 
>>>> This could be an argument to pursue climate restoration, restoring CO2 
>>>> below 300 ppm, to cool the planet.
>>>> Peter
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 5:39 PM Ron Baiman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Thanks Peter.   Unfortunately, the paper and podcast are referring to a 
>>>>> termination shock that is potentially happening right now due to a 
>>>>> well-intentioned regulation to cut the sulfur content of cargo ships from 
>>>>> a prior average of 3.5% sulfur to 0.5% 
>>>>> (https://www.joc.com/special-topics/low-sulfur-fuel-rule ) that became 
>>>>> fully effective Jan. 2020. Using ocean water surface temperature 
>>>>> measurement and satellite atmospheric albedo measurements,  for the north 
>>>>> atlantic and north pacific major shipping lanes, they estimate (still in 
>>>>> process of verification) up to (at the maximal estimate) a 50% jump in 
>>>>> global warming (as I recall from the podcast), from the time this 
>>>>> regulation became fully effective compared to prior years, as a direct 
>>>>> result of the loss of sulfur emissions across these (very large) ocean 
>>>>> regions. 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Ron
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 6:44 PM Peter Fiekowsky <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Ron-
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Just so you know-When looking through a climate restoration lens, with 
>>>>>> CO2 below 300 ppm by 2050, termination shock doesn't happen. This is 
>>>>>> because CO2 is back to pre-industrial levels by 2050, and therefore 
>>>>>> forcing is too. SRM or SAI would only be needed for 15 years between 
>>>>>> 2030 and 2045. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It might be useful starting now, but politically, there is no 
>>>>>> justification for it because it doesn't benefit the UN net-zero goal.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You can read more about climate restoration in my book coming out in 
>>>>>> April. The summary chapter is available for free now on my website: 
>>>>>> PeterFiekowsky.com 
>>>>>> All the processes for climate restoration are now getting underway, and 
>>>>>> don't require government assistance.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> BR
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 2:52 PM Ron Baiman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Colleagues
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This is the podcast I've been talking about to some of you recently: 
>>>>>>> https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ship-tracks-termination-shock-simons/id1529459393?i=1000550593731
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Here's their  draft paper: 
>>>>>>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356378673_Climate_Impact_of_Decreasing_Atmospheric_Sulphate_Aerosols_and_the_Risk_of_a_Termination_Shock
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> When Simon et al (presumably) get some version of this paper published, 
>>>>>>> it could be the centerpiece of, for example,  strong support for MCB to 
>>>>>>> offset the sulfur with benign sea salt aerosols, as it would provide 
>>>>>>> direct evidence of the impact of warming/cooling effect of marine cloud 
>>>>>>> brightening from aerosols.  It also, needless to say, highlights the 
>>>>>>> need for any and all other types of direct cooling intervention. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Ron
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "NOAC Meetings" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/noac-meetings/CAPhUB9C_RptW6t79b8ZXEZz6dcj_f%2BZNFk9DY_P7_%2BXgqXV%3DNw%40mail.gmail.com.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Peter Fiekowsky
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Foundation for Climate Restoration Founder and Chairman Emeritus
>>>>>> Restoring a proven safe climate (300 ppm CO2 by 2050) for the 
>>>>>> flourishing of humanity. Climate restoration 2021 Book summary
>>>>>> (650) 776-6871  Los Altos, California
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Peter Fiekowsky
>>>> 
>>>> Foundation for Climate Restoration Founder and Chairman Emeritus
>>>> Restoring a proven safe climate (300 ppm CO2 by 2050) for the flourishing 
>>>> of humanity. Climate restoration 2021 Book summary
>>>> (650) 776-6871  Los Altos, California
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "NOAC Meetings" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to [email protected].
>> 
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/noac-meetings/CAEr4H2%3D%2BtacYuf%3DJrw%2BSfZPpjHtxE2omT6R9fVCYwNDEHSFGEQ%40mail.gmail.com.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Peter Fiekowsky
>> 
>> Foundation for Climate Restoration Founder and Chairman Emeritus
>> Restoring a proven safe climate (300 ppm CO2 by 2050) for the flourishing of 
>> humanity. Climate restoration 2021 Book summary
>> (650) 776-6871  Los Altos, California
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Planetary Restoration" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/planetary-restoration/CAEr4H2nJoD%3D_HN4R0DSynhhYpjJHT_D3-_NVGSNMc7DJjPSVoA%40mail.gmail.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/0923FACC-3BEE-47DD-B50B-B291980A0B8D%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to