https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05122-0


Published: 05 October 2022
Invisible ship tracks show large cloud sensitivity to aerosol
Peter Manshausen, Duncan Watson-Parris, …Philip Stier Show authors
Nature volume 610, pages101–106 (2022)Cite this article

Metricsdetails

Abstract
Cloud reflectivity is sensitive to atmospheric aerosol concentrations
because aerosols provide the condensation nuclei on which water condenses1.
Increased aerosol concentrations due to human activity affect droplet
number concentration, liquid water and cloud fraction2, but these changes
are subject to large uncertainties3. Ship tracks, long lines of polluted
clouds that are visible in satellite images, are one of the main tools for
quantifying aerosol–cloud interactions4. However, only a small fraction of
the clouds polluted by shipping show ship tracks5,6. Here we show that even
when no ship tracks are visible in satellite images, aerosol emissions
change cloud properties substantially. We develop a new method to quantify
the effect of shipping on all clouds, showing a cloud droplet number
increase and a more positive liquid water response when there are no
visible tracks. We directly detect shipping-induced cloud property changes
in the trade cumulus regions of the Atlantic, which are known to display
almost no visible tracks. Our results indicate that previous studies of
ship tracks were suffering from selection biases by focusing only on
visible tracks from satellite imagery. The strong liquid water path
response we find translates to a larger aerosol cooling effect on the
climate, potentially masking a higher climate sensitivity than observed
temperature trends would otherwise suggest

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-061oB98M9ON7GadUKH26PSmgVMuSQ54eyjJxhRPiEAMKA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to