https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/07/facebook-co-founder-moskovitz-funds-sunlight-reflection-research.html
<https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/07/facebook-co-founder-moskovitz-funds-sunlight-reflection-research.html?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_medium=Social&utm_content=Main&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1675814534>


*7 February 2023*


*Catherine Clifford*

KEY POINTS

   - Sunlight reflection or solar geoengineering involves releasing
   aerosols into the atmosphere to temporarily cool the Earth.
   - The Degrees Initiative, a nonprofit research organization, just
   announced a $900,000 round of funding to grant scientists in Benin, Brazil,
   Cameroon, Chile, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mali, Nigeria,
   Pakistan, South Africa, Thailand and Uganda to study its effects.
   - The grant money comes from Open Philanthropy, a philanthropic
   organization primarily funded by Dustin Moskovitz, a co-founder of Facebook
   and Asana, and his wife, Cari Tuna.

[image: This photograph taken on May 11, 2022 shows Shivaram, a villager
walking through the cracked bottom of a dried-out pond on a hot summer day
at Bandai village in Pali district. - Every day dozens of villagers, mostly
women and children, wait with blue plastic jerry cans and metal pots for a
special train bringing precious water to people suffering a heatwave in
India's desert state of Rajasthan.]
This photograph taken on May 11, 2022 shows Shivaram, a villager walking
through the cracked bottom of a dried-out pond on a hot summer day at
Bandai village in Pali district. - Every day dozens of villagers, mostly
women and children, wait with blue plastic jerry cans and metal pots for a
special train bringing precious water to people suffering a heatwave in
India’s desert state of Rajasthan.

Scientists from Africa, Asia and South America are getting a new infusion
of $900,000 to study the effects of reflecting sunlight to cool the Earth
and mitigate the impacts of global warming. The money comes from Open
Philanthropy <https://www.openphilanthropy.org/about-us/>, a venture funded
primarily by billionaire Dustin Moskovitz
<https://www.forbes.com/profile/dustin-moskovitz/?sh=502102851dd3>, a
co-founder of Facebook <https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/META/> and Asana
<https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/ASAN/>, and his wife, Cari Tuna.

Sunlight reflection involves releasing aerosols like sulfur dioxide high in
the atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays back into space, temporarily
mitigating global warming. (It’s sometimes called solar radiation
modification or solar geoengineering.)

The idea has been around for decades, but it is being taken more seriously
as the effects of climate change become more apparent. While volcanic
eruptions have proven that the technique can work, there are significant
risks as well, including damage to the ozone layer, acid rain and increased
respiratory illness.

On Tuesday, nonprofit research organization The Degrees Initiative
<https://www.degrees.ngo/about/> and the United Nation’s World Academy of
Sciences <https://twas.org/twas-voice-science-south> announced they are
distributing more than $900,000 to scientists across Africa, Asia and South
America to study solar radiation modification in a program called “The
Degrees Modelling Fund.” <https://www.degrees.ngo/dmf/> The Degrees
Initiative has been funded by various donors over the years, but the
biggest has been Open Philanthropy
<https://www.openphilanthropy.org/about-us/> and all of the $900,000
disbursement announced Tuesday came from that group, Degrees Initiative
co-founder and CEO Andy Parker
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/andy-parker-58639724/?originalSubdomain=uk> told
CNBC.

The money will go to 81 scientists in Benin, Brazil, Cameroon, Chile,
Ghana, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mali, Nigeria, Pakistan, South Africa,
Thailand and Uganda working on 15 solar geoengineering modeling projects.
The lesser of two bad choices, akin to chemotherapy

Sunlight reflection is getting more attention as scientists have started
suggesting that its negative effects may not be as bad as the harm from
climate change will be in the future. The White House Office of Science and
Technology Policy is coordinating a five-year research plan
<https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/13/what-is-solar-geoengineering-sunlight-reflection-risks-and-benefits.html>
into
solar geoengineering and in January, the quadrennial U.N.-backed Montreal
Protocol assessment report
<https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/10/graph-shows-why-solar-geoengineering-needs-to-be-studied.html>
 included an entire chapter addressing stratospheric aerosol injection for
the first time ever.

“Like anyone else sensible, when I first heard about the idea of blocking
out the sun, I thought it was a terrible idea. As time goes by, the view
didn’t really change it. It’s a horrible idea,” Parker told CNBC. “But it
may prove to be less horrible than not using it and allowing temperatures
to keep rising if we don’t cut our emissions far enough.”

I liken the decision to chemotherapy. Chemotherapy to treat cancer is also
a horrible idea. It’s very dangerous. It’s unpleasant. It’s risky. And no
one would ever consider doing it unless they feared the alternative. might
be worse. And so it goes for solar geoengineering.
Andy Parker
CEO OF THE DEGREES INITIATIVE

Sunlight reflection is not a solution to climate change or global warming.
It is a relatively fast and inexpensive way to temporarily cool the Earth.
We know it works: In the 15 months following the eruption of Mount Pinatubo
in the Philippines in 1991
<https://www.usgs.gov/news/featured-story/remembering-mount-pinatubo-25-years-ago-mitigating-crisis>,
the average global temperature was about 1 degree Fahrenheit lower, according
to NASA
<https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/1510/global-effects-of-mount-pinatubo>.
Releasing sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere from retrofitted planes
would essentially mimic the way a volcano releases large quantities of
aerosols into the atmosphere.

“It’s not a pleasant idea. It’s not a fun thing to work on. But it’s
potentially important, it could be very, very helpful, it could be
disastrous,” Parker told CNBC.

“I liken the decision to chemotherapy. Chemotherapy to treat cancer is also
a horrible idea. It’s very dangerous. It’s unpleasant. It’s risky. And no
one would ever consider doing it unless they feared the alternative might
be worse. And so it goes for solar geoengineering,” he said.

Before launching The Degrees Initiative, Parker
<https://www.degrees.ngo/aboutusold/our-team/> led the production of a 98-page
report on geoengineering for The Royal Society
<https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2009/8693.pdf>,
an independent science academy <https://royalsociety.org/> in the United
Kingdom, and has done research at Harvard and the Institute for Advanced
Sustainability Studies in Potsdam, Germany.
[image: A giant volcanic mushroom cloud explodes some 20 kilometers high
from Mount Pinatubo above almost deserted US Clark Air Base, on June 12,
1991 followed by another more powerful explosion. The eruption of Mount
Pinatubo on June 15, 1991 was the second largest volcanic eruption of the
twentieth century.]
A giant volcanic mushroom cloud explodes some 20 kilometers high from Mount
Pinatubo above almost deserted US Clark Air Base, on June 12, 1991 followed
by another more powerful explosion. The eruption of Mount Pinatubo on June
15, 1991 was the second largest volcanic eruption of the twentieth century.
Arlan Naeg | Afp | Getty Images
Ensuring the most at-risk countries have a say

One of Parker’s goals with the Degrees Initiative is to ensure that
scientists from developing countries in the global south will be part of
international conversations about sunlight reflection, he told CNBC.

“If it can work well to reduce the impacts of climate change, then they’ve
got the most to gain because they’re on the frontlines of global warming,”
he said. “If, on the other hand, it all goes wrong and there are nasty side
effects, or perhaps if it’s rejected prematurely, when it could have
helped, then developing countries have got the most to lose.”

But without philanthropic donations, research and decisions about solar
geoengineering would be primarily relegated to the parts of the world that
can afford it, like North America, the European Union and Japan, Parker
said.

The $900,000 announced Tuesday is the second round of funding of this kind.
In 2018, The Degrees Modelling Fund distributed $900,000 to 11 projects in
Argentina, Bangladesh, Benin, Indonesia, Iran, the Ivory Coast, Jamaica,
Kenya, Philippines and South Africa.

The money goes out in grants of up to $75,000, of which $60,000 is for
salary and $15,000 is for the tools that a local research team would need,
Parker told CNBC. Each scientific team should suggest its own proposal in
the application for the grant money, he said. But broadly, the task for
each team is to use computer models to predict the weather and their
regional impacts — both with and without sunlight reflection.

“By comparing the two, they can start to generate evidence on what the
impact of solar radiation modification might be on things that matter
locally,” Parker said.
[image: Scientists who have had their work funded by The Degrees Modelling
Fund at a recent research-planning workshop for old and new teams in
Istanbul.]
Scientists who have had their work funded by The Degrees Modelling Fund at
a recent research-planning workshop for old and new teams in Istanbul.
Photo courtesy The Degrees Initiative
Researching the water cycles in La Plata Basin

Ines Camilloni, a professor
<https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/people/ines-camilloni> at
the University of Buenos Aires, has received two Degrees Initiative grants
and is also getting funded by the government of Argentina. With the
funding, Camilloni is researching how solar radiation modification would
affect the hydroclimate of La Plata Basin, the fifth largest water basin in
the world, covering parts of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay and
Uruguay, she told CNBC.

“A large fraction of the economic activities within the basin relies on
water availability, including agriculture, river navigability and
hydroelectric production, and therefore any variations in the water cycle
of the basin could have significant impacts on the economy of each
country,” Camilloni told CNBC.
[image: Prof. Inés Camilloni speaking at the 2022 Paris Peace Forum.]
Prof. Inés Camilloni speaking at the 2022 Paris Peace Forum.
Photo courtesy The Degrees Initiative

Camilloni says her research has so far showed that sunlight reflection
could be helpful to some parts of the La Plata Basin region, but
particularly harmful to others. Large rivers that power hydroelectric dams
could see higher flows and increased energy production, balanced by a risk
of more flooding.

In Buenos Aires, awareness of sunlight reflection has grown in the oast
couple years, and it spurs strong emotions.

“The range of feelings that solar radiation modification generates goes
from disbelief to fear. Everyone perceives it to be controversial,”
Camilloni told CNBC.

Clear communication is critical, though, because even research proponents
do not see it as a climate change silver bullet.

“This is no one’s Plan A for how you deal with climate risk, and whatever
happens, we have to cut our emissions,” Parker told CNBC. “But people are
finally starting to seriously address the question: What do we do if we
don’t do enough with emissions cuts, if they prove insufficient to avoid
very dangerous climate change? What are our options? And that leaves people
regretfully, but necessarily, to think about things like solar radiation
modification.”

*Source: CNBC *

*Pete **Irvine's** latest Substack on this topic ⬇️*
Developing world research into solar radiation modification just doubled

https://peteirvine.substack.com/p/developing-world-research-into-solar
<https://peteirvine.substack.com/p/developing-world-research-into-solar?utm_source=twitter&sd=pf>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAOyeF5uENTZFKsoZP5C_aweZhRUUNWuX8yd_u-ihbFN3irb%3DHg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to