https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU23/EGU23-15552.html
*AUTHORS* Andrin Jörimann1, Gabriel Chiodo <https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU23/0000-0002-8079-6314>1, Sandro Vattioni1, Timofei Sukhodolov2, Simone Tilmes <https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU23/0000-0002-6557-3569>3, Daniele Visioni <https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU23/0000-0002-7342-2189>4 , David Plummer5, and Olaf Morgenstern <https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU23/0000-0002-9967-9740>6 *ABSTRACT* Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) holds the potential to offset some of the future warming of the Earth’s surface. It comes with many potentially dangerous side effects, however, which are currently not well understood and poorly constrained. A major concern is the effect on stratospheric ozone, which could be weakened and delayed in its recovery, given that ozone-depleting substances will take decades to be completely removed. We are interested in ozone depletion and recovery in a scenario, where SAI is employed to keep the global surface temperature constant. Previous analyses have been conducted with models that have widely different treatments of aerosol microphysics and chemistry. To isolate and estimate the uncertainty of the chemical and dynamical effects in a multi-model context, CCMI-2022 proposed a new senD2-sai experiment, where the ocean is kept fixed and the elevated stratospheric aerosol burden, thus, only affects the middle atmospheric composition and temperature. Stratospheric aerosols are also uniformly prescribed for all participating models in order to minimize the uncertainty arising from the treatment of aerosol microphysics. In our work, we perform these experiments with our aerosol-chemistry-climate model SOCOLv4.0, and compare our results with other CCMI-2022 models, with a focus on the stratospheric ozone and temperature changes. We evaluate the role of individual processes, such as ozone destruction cycles and changes in large-scale transport. In addition, we discuss implementation issues related to imposing this aerosol forcing, as this will help in the interpretation of the main inter-model uncertainties. Finally, we discuss the implications of this work for our understanding of chemical feedbacks in future climate in the context of mitigation via SAI, and its relevance for future ozone assessments. How to cite: Jörimann, A., Chiodo, G., Vattioni, S., Sukhodolov, T., Tilmes, S., Visioni, D., Plummer, D., and Morgenstern, O.: Ozone in a stratospheric aerosol injection scenario, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-15552, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-15552, 2023. *Source: EGU GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2023* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh9_FkAERjdEFiBTYniTRmy3-Dv5apefav0qbeEr9WGk-KA%40mail.gmail.com.
