Hi all,

It appears that a note has been added to Biermann et al. 2022 regarding an 
editorial conflict of 
interest: https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcc.835

Content of note copied below:

Wiley received a letter regarding a potential conflict of interest present 
in the review and publication of: “Solar geoengineering: The case for an 
international non-use agreement,” by Biermann, F., et al. in *WIREs Climate 
Change*, 13(3), e754. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.754. In response to this 
concern, Wiley's Integrity in Publishing Group undertook an independent 
investigation to consider whether the peer review process adhered to the 
journal's policy of impartiality in peer review and to assess any potential 
conflict of interest. The investigation found that there was a conflict of 
interest present in the peer review process. As a result, we have decided 
to amend the publication record with this Article Note for transparency, 
which we believe will be of value to the reader to view the published 
article in its full context.
The investigation confirmed that:

   - Solar geoengineering or solar radiation management, the subject of the 
   article, is a heavily debated and highly publicized topic in the fields of 
   climate change and engineering.
   - An earlier version of this article was rejected by another journal. 
   Professor Mike Hulme, the Editor-in-Chief of *WIREs Climate Change* and 
   the handling editor of the article, was a co-author of that earlier 
   manuscript. The author group decided to expand the manuscript for 
   submission to *WIREs Climate Change* as a Perspective article. Professor 
   Hulme withdrew from the author group and was not involved in the 
   development of this new manuscript.
   - 
   
   The article is a Perspective, an article category in WIREs that “may be 
   deliberately provocative or twinned with an opposing view to capture the 
   essence of a live debate.” Due to their special nature, the criteria and 
   guidelines for reviewing Perspectives submissions are different from the 
   other review articles published in WIREs:
   Perspectives do not require a balanced citing of relevant literature 
   capturing all sides of the argument.
      - Review instructions put emphasis on the clarity of argument and the 
      credibility of the position offered as supported by the cited evidence, 
and 
      request reviewers not to state whether they agree or not with the 
opinions 
      stated, but whether they believe these opinions are clearly expressed and 
      well argued.
      - The original manuscript was sent to four reviewers by Professor 
      Hulme and the revised version was accepted following reviewer 
      recommendations.
   - Wiley maintains that best practice would have been for Professor Hulme 
   to recuse himself from the peer review process due to his involvement as an 
   author in a previous version of the manuscript.
   - Following the investigation, Wiley considered the option of further 
   post-publication peer review for the article. After discussion, it was 
   determined that the highly polarized nature of the topic, and the public 
   nature of the debate, meant that the scientific content of the article has 
   already been discussed at length following the article's publication, by 
   experts on both sides of the debate. Therefore, Wiley decided that an 
   additional peer review step was not justified.
   - Wiley acknowledges that Professor Hulme's author contribution to the 
   earlier version of the article represents a conflict of interest. However, 
   as the authors presented sound conclusions and valid arguments, and taking 
   into consideration the special nature of Perspective articles, we have 
   decided to retain the article in the publication record with the addition 
   of this acknowledgement. We believe that the published article in its 
   current form (with the additional context of this Article Note) makes a 
   significant contribution to the scientific discourse on this important 
   topic.


   - 
   
   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/75c56b30-469c-4dc3-bff0-3017b3c38706n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to