*https://www.silverlining.ngo/insights/empowering-youth-for-climate-intervention-global-youth-summit-2023
<https://www.silverlining.ngo/insights/empowering-youth-for-climate-intervention-global-youth-summit-2023>*
*Sep 12, 2023*
*by Irfan Ullah, Aarushi Shah
<https://www.silverlining.ngo/insights?author=64e7c31771003b2fedd33150>*

The recent Sixth Assessment (AR6) synthesis report
<https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/> by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change paints a stark reality - the
world is hurtling towards surpassing the critical 1.5°C global warming
threshold. The imperative to limit global warming to a maximum of 1.5°C
above pre-industrial levels is not merely a statistic, but a safeguard
against an array of catastrophic impacts. Crossing 1.5°C will have severe
and lasting consequences for both humanity and the delicate ecosystems that
sustain us. Rising temperatures usher in a cavalcade of extreme weather
events - heatwaves, hurricanes, floods, and droughts - inflicting
irrevocable damage on lives, livelihoods, and entire communities. As these
consequences of a warming planet unfold, it’s the most vulnerable who bear
the brunt while being those who contributed the least to the crisis.


Against this backdrop, SilverLining’s Global Young Leaders Initiative held
"Can We Keep 1.5°C Alive? A Global Youth Summit on Near-term Climate Risk
and Climate Interventions”, an event that united a cohort of young climate
leaders, expert climate scientists, and activists to discuss climate
intervention research and policies. Our goal was to facilitate a uniquely
intergenerational space where young people are at the forefront of future
developments in climate intervention. The event was held virtually in May.

While strides have been made to cut greenhouse gas emissions, the truth
remains sobering: the current efforts fall short of averting the impending
catastrophe, and the climate is projected to continue to warm through 2050
<https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/figures/summary-for-policymakers/figure-spm-8>
under every scenario for emissions. As one of the summit speakers,
Joyashree Roy, Founder and Director of South and South East Asia
Multidisciplinary Research Network on Transforming Societies of Global
South (SMARTS), highlighted, “The current pace and scale of climate action
is not enough.” The world is already experiencing the impacts of global
warming, from extreme weather events to rising sea levels. "We are living
in a disaster," said Neeshad Shafi, another summit speaker, SilverLining
International Strategy Fellow, and Co-founder and Executive Director at the
Arab Youth Climate Movement Qatar. These grim assertions underscore the
critical need to explore all options to ‘keep 1.5°C alive’.

As a result, stakeholders around the world are beginning to consider “solar
climate interventions
<https://www.silverlining.ngo/reports/roadmap-for-climate-intervention-research>”
as a potential avenue for reducing the impending near term risks of climate
change. Scientific assessments have identified solar climate intervention
(SCI) as an approach for rapidly cooling down the planet by increasing the
amount of sunlight reflected by particles and clouds in the atmosphere.
Such interventions could help curb catastrophic near-term climate impacts
particularly for the most vulnerable among us. They could also help avoid
crossing of thresholds for irreversible changes to natural systems
(“tipping points”) that exceed human and natural systems’ ability to adapt.
These interventions are not a replacement for the crucial work of reducing
emissions, which must continue, but are an increasingly important part of
the climate research agenda.

The European Union
<https://www.ft.com/content/8196059a-ecdf-4615-9f5d-ed1d4ab70cbd>, the United
States
<https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/13/what-is-solar-geoengineering-sunlight-reflection-risks-and-benefits.html>,
and the United Nations Environment Programme
<https://www.unep.org/resources/report/Solar-Radiation-Modification-research-deployment>
recently released official publications on the need for research in climate
interventions. However, there is a considerable gap in the awareness and
involvement of the most climate-vulnerable people and especially youth in
policy and public conversations around climate interventions. As
international attention grows, it is imperative for youth to have the
opportunity to engage with scientists and policymakers to provide their
perspectives and meaningfully contribute to just climate intervention
policies and decision-making. Despite the powerful possibilities of these
interventions, all too frequently they are discussed among people who will
not live to see the worst impacts of climate change. There remains a
considerable gap in the awareness and involvement of the most climate
vulnerable—among those, the world’s young people.

Our speakers came from 11 countries, and 83 participants joined from south
Asia, northern and sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, Europe, and other
regions of the world to learn more about youth perspectives on climate
intervention and engage. Over sixty percent of our participants were from
Africa. With this global outlook, the summit illustrated the full scope of
climate challenges experienced worldwide, highlighting the importance of
climate intervention research and policies within their unique regional
contexts. Three crucial themes took the stage.

Research: From the summit dialogues emerged a core idea: Youth urgently
need to be involved in climate research, especially research related to
climate interventions. This idea was underlined by Jyoti Singh,
Postdoctoral Researcher at the Rutgers Impact Studies of Climate
Intervention (RISCI) Laboratory, and Lydia Dai, Contact Point for the
YOUNGO Adaptation Working Group and a SilverLining International Strategy
Fellow, who provided insights as young trailblazers in this field. This
involvement starts with nurturing fresh talent and bridging gaps between
the research capacities of the Global North and South. We also received an
enlightening session describing the most viable solar climate intervention
approaches from  climate experts Jim Hurrell, Professor and Scott
Presidential Chair in Environmental Science and Engineering at Colorado
State University, and Sarah Doherty, Senior Research Scientist and Marine
Cloud Brightening Project Program Manager, University of Washington. “If we
want to try to keep global temperatures at well below 2 degrees warming, as
mentioned in the Paris Climate Agreement, we need to research. We need to
understand the benefits and the risks of solar climate intervention
relative to the risks that we know are going to be caused by climate
change,” said Jim.

Justice: One common thread weaved through all our discussions: the distinct
gap between the climate research prowess of the Global North and the uphill
climb faced by the Global South. As SilverLining Executive Director Kelly
Wanser highlighted, this research requires supercomputers, the ability to
process massive amounts of data, and funding. Jyoti and Irfan Ullah,
Founder of Sustainability Week Pakistan (one of the authors of this blog
post), drew attention to a sobering reality – the lack of research muscle
in the Global South. Most research on climate interventions (and climate
change overall) is produced in the Global North. As Irfan mentioned at the
summit, “There is not much capacity building and awareness raising
happening in the Global South on climate intervention.” It's not just about
having a seat at the table; it's about making sure everyone has the
knowledge and information to make responsible decisions about climate
intervention that are rooted in science. We need local experts who can
study nuanced regional impacts of climate change and climate interventions.”

International Governance: Both Brenda Mwale, Chief Operations Officer of
Green Girls Platform, and Kelly Wanser shared a common insight: the
significance of localized climate research to understand regional impacts,
thereby laying a robust foundation for informed global choices regarding
solar climate interventions. How can we leverage the power of international
governance to direct more resources, talent, and investments into climate
intervention research? Scaling up of climate intervention research
capacity, as Kelly highlighted, could find its wings within the established
frameworks of the World Meteorological Organization and the World Climate
Research Programme.

Through these discussions, several calls to action reverberated throughout
the summit, forging a collective mission to enrich youth understanding and
engagement in pivotal dialogues concerning solar climate interventions.

Raise awareness and empower youth: The summit's primary objective was to
promote understanding and awareness of climate intervention among youth.
Youth are future leaders, decision-makers, and planet stewards who can
become active contributors in researching and assessing solar climate
interventions. A clear illustration of youth-led initiatives unfolded in
the third session, spotlighting Operaatio Arktis
<https://www.operaatioarktis.fi/en>, a project that aims to ignite
conversations about climate interventions in Finland and foster research.
Orchestrated by a team of 16 young adults, Operaatio Arktis showcased a
remarkable model of youth engagement for us all to appreciate. Empowering
youth voices necessitates creating ample avenues, akin to this platform,
for us to come together, exchange ideas, and mutually enrich our
understanding of climate intervention. SilverLining’s Global Young Leaders
Initiative stands poised to bridge this gap, aiming to facilitate similar
opportunities for youth engagement.

Support equitable research: The summit dialogues echoed a call for offering
research guidance, resources, and financial support to young researchers
who harbor an interest in studying climate intervention and fostering their
growth as future leaders in this field. Jyoti and Irfan underscored the
significance of this support, particularly for young researchers in the
Global South who often confront unequal access to such opportunities.
Research support is crucial for youth involved in climate intervention, as
it enables them to gain a deeper understanding of the complexities
surrounding climate intervention. Research provides a foundation of
knowledge and evidence-based insights and makes young people able to
contribute substantially to discussions, policies, and planning around
climate intervention research.

*“Can We Keep 1.5°C Alive? A Global Youth Summit on Near-term Climate Risk
and Climate Interventions”* was a unique platform which united young
leaders, experts, and activists to discuss the pressing impacts of our
warming planet and the potential of climate interventions to mitigate
emerging risks. As the urgent need to limit global warming to 1.5°C becomes
more apparent, we need more platforms like this one.

Our summit underscored the pivotal role of youth engagement in discussions
about climate intervention research and policy. By empowering and involving
youth in policy dialogues and decision-making processes, youth voices can
play a powerful role in shaping effective climate intervention strategies.
With a resounding call to action, it illuminated the path forward, urging
us to empower youth voices, continue the important work of reducing
emissions, support comprehensive research on climate intervention, and
foster collaborative initiatives for a safe and equitable future.






*Irfan Ullah is a climate adaptation expert, the Founder of Sustainability
Week Pakistan, and a youth advisor at Global Center on Adaptation (GCA). He
works as a Consultant with UNICEF. He is a SilverLining International
Strategy Fellow.*

*Aarushi Shah is a Research Analyst at SilverLining. She completed her
undergraduate degree at Georgetown University, where she studied Economics,
Business Administration and STIA (Science, Technology and International
Affairs) with a concentration in Energy and Environment. Aarushi also
manages a blog dedicated to the latest news and developments in
environmental sustainability.*

*Source: SilverLining*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh98ZUQFX8rhpJYXxz83axzUKutLnzay1AU8QRCbA39pz2Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to