WEEKLY SUMMARY (11 DECEMBER - 17 DECEMBER 2023)
<https://substack.com/app-link/publications/1945767/drafts/cb34af50-1488-493d-b9c5-3ba1225e79c6?publication_id=1945767&post_id=139893199&utm_source=post-email-title&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false>Links
to recent scientific papers, web posts, upcoming events, job opportunities,
podcasts, and event recordings, etc. on Solar Radiation Management
Technology.



*Subscribe to Solar Geoengineering Updates Substack here:*

Thanks for reading Solar Geoengineering Updates! Subscribe for free to
receive new posts and support my work.

Pledge your support
<https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com/subscribe?utm_source=test&utm_campaign=email-checkout&next=https%3A%2F%2Fsolargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com%2Fpublish%2Fpost%2F139893199&utm_medium=email&utm_source=subscribe-widget-preamble&utm_content=139893199>
FUNDING REQUESTMarine Cloud Rebrightening Project by Rebrighten.org
<https://groups.google.com/g/geoengineering/c/gbM7leIGbeY>
<https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F3bfc24b2-bb26-4f59-bd8b-fbb078f22b57_960x540.png>
------------------------------
RESEARCH PAPERSChanges in apparent temperature and PM2.5 around the
Beijing–Tianjin megalopolis under greenhouse gas and stratospheric aerosol
intervention scenarios <https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/14/989/2023/>

Wang, J., Moore, J. C., & Zhao, L. (2023). Changes in apparent temperature
and PM 2.5 around the Beijing–Tianjin megalopolis under greenhouse gas and
stratospheric aerosol intervention scenarios. *Earth System Dynamics*, *14*(5),
989-1013.*Abstract*Apparent temperature (AP) and ground-level aerosol
pollution (PM2.5) are important factors in human health, particularly in
rapidly growing urban centers in the developing world. We quantify how
changes in apparent temperature – that is, a combination of 2 m air
temperature, relative humidity, surface wind speed, and
PM2.5 concentrations – that depend on the same meteorological factors along
with future industrial emission policy may impact people in the greater
Beijing region. Four Earth system model (ESM) simulations of the modest
greenhouse emissions RCP4.5 (Representative Concentration Pathway), the
“business-as-usual” RCP8.5, and the stratospheric aerosol intervention G4
geoengineering scenarios are downscaled using both a 10 km resolution
dynamic model (Weather Research and Forecasting, WRF) and a statistical
approach (Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project – ISIMIP). We
use multiple linear regression models to simulate changes in PM2.5 and the
contributions meteorological factors make in controlling seasonal AP and
PM2.5. WRF produces warmer winters and cooler summers than ISIMIP both now
and in the future. These differences mean that estimates of numbers of days
with extreme apparent temperatures vary systematically with downscaling
method, as well as between climate models and scenarios. Air temperature
changes dominate differences in apparent temperatures between future
scenarios even more than they do at present because the reductions in
humidity expected under solar geoengineering are overwhelmed by rising
vapor pressure due to rising temperatures and the lower wind speeds
expected in the region in all future scenarios. Compared with the 2010s,
the PM2.5 concentration is projected to decrease by 5.4 µg m−3 in the
Beijing–Tianjin province under the G4 scenario during the 2060s from the
WRF downscaling but decrease by 7.6 µg m−3 using ISIMIP. The relative risk
of five diseases decreases by 1.1 %–6.7 % in G4, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5 using
ISIMIP but has a smaller decrease (0.7 %–5.2 %) using WRF. Temperature and
humidity differences between scenarios change the relative risk of disease
from PM2.5 such that G4 results in 1 %–3 % higher health risks than RCP4.5.
Urban centers see larger rises in extreme apparent temperatures than rural
surroundings due to differences in land surface type, and since these are
also the most densely populated, health impacts will be dominated by the
larger rises in apparent temperatures in these urban areas.

*A Quasi-Linear Relationship between Planetary Outgoing Longwave Radiation
and Surface Temperature in a Radiative-Convective-Transportive Climate
Model of a Gray Atmosphere
<https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00376-023-2386-1>*

Sun, J., Secor, M., Cai, M., & Hu, X. (2024). A Quasi-Linear Relationship
between Planetary Outgoing Longwave Radiation and Surface Temperature in a
Radiative-Convective-Transportive Climate Model of a Gray Atmosphere. *Advances
in Atmospheric Sciences*, *41*(1), 8-18.*Abstract*In this study, we put
forward a radiative-convective-transportive energy balance model of a gray
atmosphere to examine individual roles of the greenhouse effect of water
vapor, vertical convection, and atmospheric poleward energy transport as
well as their combined effects for a quasi-linear relationship between the
outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) and surface temperature (*TS*). The
greenhouse effect of water vapor enhances the meridional gradient of
surface temperature, thereby directly contributing to a quasi-linear OLR-
*TS* relationship. The atmospheric poleward energy transport decreases the
meridional gradient of surface temperature. As a result of the poleward
energy transport, tropical (high-latitude) atmosphere-surface columns emit
less (more) OLR than the solar energy input at their respective locations,
causing a substantial reduction of the meridional gradient of the OLR. The
combined effect of reducing the meridional gradients of both OLR and
surface temperature by the poleward energy transport also contributes to
the quasi-linear OLR-*TS* relationship. Vertical convective energy
transport reduces the meridional gradient of surface temperature without
affecting the meridional gradient of OLR, thereby suppressing part of the
reduction to the increasing rate of OLR with surface temperature by the
greenhouse effect of water vapor and poleward energy transport. Because of
the nature of the energy balance in the climate system, such a quasi-linear
relationship is also a good approximation for the relationship between the
annual-mean net downward solar energy flux at the top of the atmosphere and
surface temperature.

Assessment of Global Warming and of Mitigation Methods Using Albedo
Enhancement from Algae, Cloud, and Land
<https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1154/11/3/62/pdf?version=1698835102>

Lightburn, Kenneth D. "Can a Symbolic Mega-Unit of Radiative Forcing (RF)
Improve Understanding and Assessment of Global Warming and of Mitigation
Methods Using Albedo Enhancement from Algae, Cloud, and Land (AEfACL)?."
*Climate* 11.3 (2023): 62.AbstractBy expressing radiative forcing (RF) in a
symbolic mega-unit we better communicate, to governing organizations and
the public, the extent of global warming (GW) and the potency of mitigation
methods while also ‘translating’ different GW measures to better explain
their interrelationship. An easily visualized symbol that has been
suggested is the net shading, or mega-unit, of RF of a “standard 1 km2
cumulus cloud over one day of −25 W/m2” (ScCd). As defined, ScCd is equal
to 600,000 kWh and equivalent to Temporary heat radiation Equivalent Carbon
(ThrEC) of 18,400 tons of carbon heat effect, or 67,300 tons of CO2 and an
approximately 0.136 albedo increase, over 1 km2. Shading over the whole
earth caused by clouds is estimated by NASA as −13 W/m2. The excess of
solar radiation or Earth Energy Imbalance (EEI) striking the earth was +
1.12 W/m2 in mid-2019 and has been continually increasing. Offsetting this
requires the creation of additional reflective surfaces equivalent to
22.848 million square kilometers of ScCd. Such an increase could be
provided by albedo enhancement from algae on the ocean surface, marine
cloud brightening (MCB) or new marine cloud creation, or land area use that
rejuvenates salt flats and similar locations (AEfACL). These are
potentially politically acceptable and eventually could be achieved at
large enough scale to be effective globally.

A Numerical Modeling Study on the Earth’s Surface Brightening Effect of
Cirrus Thinning <https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202312.0733/v1>

Shi, X., Liu, Y., & Liu, J. (2023). A Numerical Modeling Study on the
Earth’s Surface Brightening Effect of Cirrus Thinning.AbstractCirrus
thinning, as one kind of geoengineering approach, not only cools our planet
but also enhances the amount of sunlight reaching Earth's surface
(brightening effect). This study delves into the brightening effect induced
by cirrus thinning with a flexible seeding method. The thinning of only
cirrus clouds results in a considerable globally averaged cooling effect
(−2.46 W m−2), along with a notable globally averaged brightening effect
(2.19 W m−2). Cirrus thinning also results in substantial reductions in the
cloud radiative effects of the lower mixed-phase and liquid clouds. While
these reductions counteract the cooling effect from cirrus clouds, they
enhance the brightening effect from cirrus clouds. Consequently, the
brightening effect caused by cirrus seeding (4.69 W m−2) is considerably
more potent than its cooling effect (−1.21 W m−2). Furthermore, due to the
more pronounced changes from the mixed-phase and liquid clouds at low- and
mid-latitudes, the cooling effect is primarily concentrated at high
latitudes. In contrast, the brightening effect is significantly stronger
over most low- and mid-latitude regions. Overall, cirrus thinning could
lead to a notable brightening effect, which can be leveraged to offset the
dimming effect (the opposite of brightening effect) of other geoengineering
approaches.

Governing Emerging Solar Geoengineering: A Role for Risk-Risk Evaluation?
<https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/913651/summary>

McLaren, D. (2023). Governing Emerging Solar Geoengineering: A Role for
Risk-Risk Evaluation?. *Georgetown Journal of International Affairs*, *24*(2),
234-243.AbstractIn the face of rapid global heating, ideas of solar
geoengineering are receiving increased attention. Yet the governance of
such risky emerging technologies is poorly explored. Here I examine how the
risks involved in solar geoengineering might be assessed in the context of
climate risks in two different models of risk management: the technocratic,
and the securitized. I show that neither model alone provides a sufficient
foundation for a meaningful ‘risk-risk’ assessment, and suggest a need for
better defined, yet broad scope, symmetric assessments using worst-case as
well as idealised scenarios, taking into account risks in research and
development as well as deployment, and considering the social distribution
of risks. I conclude that effective anticipatory and ethical risk
assessment may usefully supplement, but cannot replace democratic political
judgements on responses to climate change.

Developing Proposals for Ethically Informed Operational Guidelines for
Climate Engineering Technologies
<https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-50154-8_4>

Brooks, L., Cannizzaro, S., Bhalla, N., & Richardson, K. (2023, December).
Developing Proposals for Ethically Informed Operational Guidelines for
Climate Engineering Technologies. In *IFIP Joint Working Conference on the
Future of Digital Work: The Challenge of Inequality* (pp. 28-49). Cham:
Springer Nature Switzerland.AbstractIt is generally acknowledged in the
21st century that climate change and hence climate engineering (CE) is one
of the biggest issues facing the planet. If we cannot get this under
control, in some way, then the future looks very bleak. As Latour says, the
issue is both political and ecological, and some people prefer to look away
and deny climate change [1
<https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-50154-8_4#ref-CR1>].
In this paper, we aim to look at climate engineering technologies from an
ethical viewpoint and develop a set of proposals for possible
re-engineering of existing guidelines (the Tollgate Principles [2
<https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-50154-8_4#ref-CR2>])
in the light of these ethics values and principles.

<https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/14/989/2023/>
------------------------------
WEB POSTSHarvard awards two Degrees scientists groundbreaking funding for
SRM research
<https://www.degrees.ngo/harvard-awards-two-degrees-scientists-groundbreaking-funding-for-srm-research/>
(The Degrees Initiative)Unlocking Climate Secrets: The Hidden Physics
Behind Temperature and Radiation
<https://scitechdaily.com/unlocking-climate-secrets-the-hidden-physics-behind-temperature-and-radiation/>
(Sci-Tech Daily)Harvard CID Announces Recipients of 2023 GEM Incubation
Fund, Supporting Climate Research and Policy Impact in Developing Countries
<https://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/cid/voices/2023-gem-incubation-fund-award-recipients>
(Harvard University)Cornell Climate Engineering Group - what happened in
2023 <http://dan-visioni.github.io/files/2023_Lab_Report.pdf> (Cornell
University)'Forcing' the issue—Make Sunsets' raison d'etre, namely to shift
the narrative surrounding solar radiation management
<https://www.keepcool.co/p/forcing-the-issue> (Keep Cool)
[image: Surface Temperature and Outgoing Longwave Radiation]
<https://scitechdaily.com/unlocking-climate-secrets-the-hidden-physics-behind-temperature-and-radiation/>
------------------------------
THESESColonizing the climate?: A decolonial critical analysis of the global
scientific discourse on solar geoengineering
<https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/45641>Effect of
stratospheric aerosol injection strategy on radiative forcing and
precipitation <https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/89061#>
------------------------------
REPORTSGeoengineering Solutions: Should such technologies be used to help
curb climate change?
<https://cqpress.sagepub.com/cqresearcher/report/geoengineering-solutions-cqresrre20231201?tab=Pro%2FCon>
<https://cqpress.sagepub.com/cqresearcher/report/geoengineering-solutions-cqresrre20231201?tab=Pro%2FCon>
------------------------------
JOB OPPORTUNITIESProgrammes Officer at The Degrees Initiative | Remote
within the United Kingdom
<https://www.degrees.ngo/job-opportunity-hiring-a-new-programmes-officer/>

*“The Degrees Initiative is a UK-based charity that builds the capacity of
developing countries to evaluate solar radiation modification (SRM) climate
engineering, a controversial proposal for reducing some of the impacts of
climate change. The Degrees Initiative is neutral on whether SRM should
ever be used, but we believe that developing countries should be empowered
to conduct their own research and to play a central role in SRM
discussions. The initiative has been registered as a UK charity since 2021,
but it has been operating for ten years as the Solar Radiation Management
Governance Initiative (SRMGI) and its work has received widespread
acclaim.”*

UCL Earth Sciences Ph.D. scholarship | Application Deadline: 29 January 2023
<https://www.ucl.ac.uk/earth-sciences/news/2023/dec/ucl-earth-sciences-phd-scholarship>

*“UCL Earth Sciences is engaged in world-class research into the processes
at work on and within the Earth and other planets. The department has
strong links with resources and hazard risk industries, with most graduates
finding employment within academia or geoscience-related industries.
Awardees are free to engage in research in any Geoscience-related field
from the surface to the core, from Earth to planets. The primary advisor
must be an academic staff member of UCL Earth Science. Candidates should
contact potential primary advisors to discuss potential projects. The
research interests of potential supervisors are listed on the Dept webpages
(follow the links to the webpages of academic staff members). Secondary
advisors can be outside the Earth Sciences Department, but have to be
affiliated UCL with the University of London.**Candidates can outline their
own projects with the guidance of potential supervisors, and/or focus on a
project suggested by them. The details of the project can be further
developed after the application deadline; only a very brief outline needs
to be included in the application statement. Projects can potentially be
changed after the award has been issued, with permission of the
Department.”*

------------------------------
PODCASTSBabbage: Geoengineering, something new under the sun | Economist
Podcasts
<https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/babbage-geoengineering-something-new-under-the-sun/id151230264?i=1000638471416>

*“The kind of emissions reductions promised in this week’s sweeping COP28
agreement will not suffice to meet the most ambitious climate goals. So
other plans to slow the warming are coming to the fore. Solar
geoengineering—modifying the amount of Earth’s incoming sunlight—is a
once-fringe idea that is at last being taken seriously. It is a strategy
with considerable promise, and considerable potential risks.**Host: Alok
Jha, The Economist’s science and technology editor. Contributors: Rachel
Dobbs, The Economist’s climate correspondent; Oliver Morton, a senior
editor at The Economist; Douglas MacMartin, a geoengineering researcher at
Cornell University; and Shuchi Talati, who leads the Alliance for Just
Deliberation on Solar Geoengineering.”*

David Keith on Climate Systems Engineering | Challenging Climate
<https://www.challengingclimate.org/1873533/14123088>

*“David Keith is a Professor in the Department of Geophysical Sciences at
the University of Chicago and the Founding Faculty Director of the Climate
Systems Engineering initiative. Keith previously led the development of
Harvard’s Solar Geoengineering Research Program.**In this episode, we
discuss Keith’s Climate Systems Engineering initiatives, carbon dioxide
removal (CDR) and geoengineering techniques. Drawing on David’s decades of
expertise, we dive deep into topics such as CDR, solar geoengineering, ice
sheet geoengineering.”*

Ethics of Volcano Geoengineering - Cassidy | Reviewer 2 does geoengineering

Ethics of Volcano Geoengineering - Cassidy

Reviewer 2 does geoengineering

1:03:54
<https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ethics-of-volcano-geoengineering-cassidy/id1529459393?i=1000638423140&uo=4>

*“Should the army be allowed to blow people up with a volcano? If your
geothermal power plant triggers an eruption, is that just a risk of doing
business? Should we fiddle with volcanoes to make them safer? Is even
researching this opening a can of worms? Gideon Futurman interviews Michael
Cassidy (giving @geoengineering1 a month long editing nightmare, but with
results we hope you'll like).**Paper: The Ethics of Volcano Geoengineering,
Michael Cassidy, Anders Sandberg, Lara Mani:
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003714
<https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003714>”*


YOUTUBE VIDEOS
What is your perspective about Solar Radiation Modification? | SRM Youth
Watch <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2c8yHfHdPvQ>

*“Irfan Ullah shares why young people's involvement in discussions on solar
radiation modification and its governance is crucial. **Irfan Ullah is the
Founder of Sustainability Week Pakistan. He has a Joint master's degree in
Geography of Environmental Risk and Human Security from the United Nations
University; Institute of Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS), and
University of Bonn, Germany. He is also a SilverLining International
Strategy Fellow.”*

The sociotechnical dynamics of negative emissions, carbon removal, and
solar geoengineering | Policy Studies Organization
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05lx7K5jNXM>Climate Interventions – Mad or
not? Why Nordics Should Take Lead – Operaatio Arktis @COP28 | Operaatio
Arktis <https://www.youtube.com/live/IZfOUeeqIGU?si=Dj3WUdCa5SQMQmtY>
<https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F3306d525-85fd-4e19-8807-899ef31c5b3a_720x392.png>

*“Climate Interventions are necessary if we are to stay below 1.5 °C and
avoid crossing multiple earth system tipping points. The severe and
irreversible threats from crossing these tipping points pose a great
challenge for near-term climate policy. Yet, Climate Interventions are
largely dismissed in policy making and under-researched in academia. Many
uncertainties about Climate Interventions remain, but there is still a
significant chance of preventing major climate impacts and collapses in
Earth systems with these measures. **Marianne Hagen (UArctic) and Dr. Shaun
Fitzgerald OBE FREng (Cambridge University) join youth-led activist group
Operaatio Arktis to discuss the role of Nordic countries in solar radiation
management and ice sheet conservation research, development and their
governance. Join us as we delve into a new way of looking at climate action
and open a necessary conversation with the young generation’s voice at the
center.”*

*What are your findings on stratospheric aerosol injection's impact on
malaria in South India |* SRM Youth Watch
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-_vTbsBJpQ>

*“Varisha Khan shares insights into her research findings on the impact of
stratospheric aerosol injection on malaria in South India.**Varisha Khan is
an MSc student of Health Informatics working as a Research Associate under
a project at COMSATS University, Islamabad. The institute has a leading
team devoted to climate action in the context of geoengineering, focusing
on the Global South. Varisha’s goal is to scrutinise the “Trade-off Based
Impacts of SRM on Malaria Distribution across South Asia, particularly
Pakistan”.”*

Crispus Mwemaho: An Insightful Perspective on Solar Radiation Modification
Research and Governance | SRM Youth Watch
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amnTnF7Kzow>

*“Crispus Mwemaho a climate activist and founder of Kampala Climate Cafe
shares his perspectives on Solar Radiation Modification Research and
governance during a recent interview with SRM YW.”*

C2GTalk: Why is it important to uphold ethics in the research on solar
radiation modification? | C2G Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWzcTvqWmko>

*“More research is needed to explore all aspects of solar radiation
modification, including the technology and its impact on society, says the
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’s (UNESCO)
assistant director-general Gabriela Ramos. It is important to build public
trust in the research by engaging a wide and inclusive cross-section of
society, including people from the arts and humanities. **Gabriela Ramos is
the Assistant Director-General for the Social and Human Sciences of the
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO),
where she oversees the institution's contributions to building inclusive
societies. Her mandate includes tackling economic inequalities of income
and opportunity, and promoting social inclusion and gender equality. She
also oversees the youth support agenda, promotion of values through sport,
fight against racism and discrimination, and ethics of science, including
of neurotechnology and the internet of things. She has overseen the
development and adoption of the first global instrument to promote the
ethics of artificial intelligence, adopted by acclamation in 2021 by
UNESCO's General Conference. She also launched the Global Forum against
Racism, to catalyse the political support that member countries have given
to this cause. On gender, she has advanced several initiatives,
particularly to combat gender stereotypes and biases, including in new
technologies.”*

*What is X-risk and how does solar radiation modification become relevant
in this field? | SRM Youth Watch*
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DExwQTomIW8>

*“Trisha Patel explains what X-risk is and how solar radiation modification
become relevant in the field at the launch event of SRM YW during New York
Climate Week. **Trisha Patel holds an MSc in Climate Change and Sustainable
Development and is a research associate for a Degrees Initiative project
exploring the impacts of SRM on human health and biodiversity. In tandem,
she's a fellow with the Existential Risk Alliance, investigating the
interplay between SRM and global catastrophic risk. Trisha has published on
SRM in South Africa, the geopolitics of SRM and public perceptions of
climate change. In her free time, she draws abstract art and is an avid
reader of sci-fi novels.”*

America Wants to Block the Sun: Is US Playing with Fire? | Vantage with
Palki Sharma | Firstpost <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6_PSNG7GuU>

*“America Wants to Block the Sun: Is US Playing with Fire? | Vantage with
Palki Sharma**The Biden administration wants to study altering sunlight.
The U.S. wants to research a phenomenon called solar radiation
modification. It may want to undertake solar experimentation in the future.
But this concept is extremely controversial. For starters, it could
abruptly increase temperatures. So is the U.S. playing with fire? Or can
blocking the Sun help reverse the effects of climate change. Palki Sharma
tells you.”*


CONSULTATIONS REQUIRED
The ARIA Research opportunity space on climate engineering is open for
feedback
<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.aria.org.uk%2Fcontact-mark%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cp.irvine%40ucl.ac.uk%7C008b4ab31f2044c2724708dbf73e3e0e%7C1faf88fea9984c5b93c9210a11d9a5c2%7C0%7C0%7C638375620925610682%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qGHxBci%2FBYzMP5KLxyX6PFq%2F%2Bk4BW62ZntseuWxe3gE%3D&reserved=0>
------------------------------
*DEADLINES**EXTENSION: Call for Proposals-Grants for social science
research on solar radiation modification | Deadline: 20 December 2023
<https://link.sbstck.com/redirect/406a123d-1524-41ec-b2b9-486abcf28cdf?j=eyJ1IjoiMjJrMHl3In0.wQQsFypG52typ8FI2nhnJ8eUoUIIkdCkuhmzxNYKtgE>*
(NEW) EGU session on SRM: Advances in Solar Radiation Modification Research
<https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU24/session/49142> | Deadline:
10 January 2024*Call for Papers: Special Collection "Towards a
Risk-Risk-Assessment of Solar Radiation Modification"
<https://academic.oup.com/oocc/pages/solar-radiation-modification?login=false>
|
Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 May 2024*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh98w590tdzDAEH4vC%3DO96fFXs%3DaVxdtsns3toAVniE_KDw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to