*This item and others will be in the monthly “Solar Geoengineering Updates Substack” newsletter:* https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com/ -----------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1674200124000014 *Authors* Qianjun Mao, Xin Nie https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2023.12.013 *03 January 2024* *Abstract* The aerosol nonsphericity causes great uncertainty in radiative forcing assessments and climate simulations. Although considerable studies have attempted to quantify this uncertainty, the relationship between aerosol nonsphericity and particle size is usually not considered, thus reducing the accuracy of results. In this paper, coupled inversion algorithm combining improved stochastic particle swarm optimization algorithm and angular light-scattering is used for the nonparametric estimation of aerosol nonsphericity variation with particle size, and the optimal sample selection method is employed to screen data. Based on the verification of inversion accuracy, the variation of aerosol aspect ratio with particle size based on the ellipsoidal model in global regions has been obtained from AERONET data, and the effect of nonsphericity on radiative forcing and dry deposition has been studied. The results show that the aspect ratio increases with particle size in all regions, with the maximum from 1.4 to 1.8 in the desert, reflecting the differences in aerosol composition at different particle sizes. In radiation calculations, considering aerosol nonsphericity makes the aerosol cooling effect weaker and surface radiative fluxes increase, but hardly change the aerosol absorption, with maximum differences of 9.22% and 22.12% at the bottom and top of the atmosphere, respectively. Meanwhile, the differences in radiative forcing between aspect ratios as a function of particle size and not varying with particle size are not significant, averaging less than 2%. Besides, the aspect ratio not varying with particle size underestimates the deposition velocity of small particles and overestimates that of large particles compared to that as a function of particle size, with maximum differences of 7% and 4%, respectively. *Graphical abstract* *Source: ScienceDirect**[image: Image 1]* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh9-K74uXjqbogeSQ2YxGAofik3JEL0ojtDTfQULS5Ax17Q%40mail.gmail.com.
