*WEEKLY SUMMARY (26 FEBRUARY - 03 MARCH 2024)*

*Subscribe to our newsletter to receive monthly updates on Solar
Geoengineering:*
Solar Geoengineering Updates
<https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=publication_embed&utm_medium=email>
Monthly news summaries about solar geoengineering. Links to scientific
papers, news articles, jobs, podcasts, and videos.
<https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=publication_embed&utm_medium=email>
By Andrew Lockley
<https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=publication_embed&utm_medium=email>
------------------------------
*RESEARCH PAPERS*Marine-cloud brightening: an airborne concept
<https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2515-7620/ad2f71>

Claudel, C., Lockley, A. J., Hoffmann, F., & Xia, Y. (2023). Marine Cloud
Brightening: an airborne concept.

*Abstract*

Marine Cloud Brightening (MCB) is a proposed Solar Radiation Modification
(SRM) geoengineering technique to enhance Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) cloud
albedo. Extant proposals consider 10,000-100,000 autonomous ships spraying
seawater, generating and dispersing sea salt nanoparticles. Alternatively,
this paper proposes industrially manufacturing NaCl nanoparticles using
ethanol anti-solvent brine precipitation. With desiccation, size
optimization and narrowed size distribution, aerosol mass flux reduces by
500x (17x for dry mass flux). This facilitates Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
delivery (e.g. MQ-9 Reaper Unmanned Aerial Vehicle). Increased speed and
wake turbulence improves areal coverage per vehicle vs. ships --- reducing
fleet size. Utilizing extant airframe designs improves vehicle Technology
Readiness Level (TRL) --– potentially improving system operational cost
(est. $40B per year) and lead time. This approach further reduces energy
requirements (5x less), technical risk and system complexity. Increased
readiness amplifies proliferation risk --- particularly for inexpensive
regional heatwave and hurricane suppression --- making governance more
urgent.

Implication of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering on compound
precipitation and temperature extremes in Africa
<https://www.pnnl.gov/publications/implication-stratospheric-aerosol-geoengineering-compound-precipitation-and>

Obahoundje, S., Nguessan-Bi, V. H., Diedhiou, A., Kravitz, B., & Moore, J.
C. (2023). Implication of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering on compound
precipitation and temperature extremes in Africa. *Science of the Total
Environment*, *863*, 160806.

*Abstract*

Three Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) models that simulated
the G4 experiment of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project
(GeoMIP) were used to investigate the impact of stratospheric aerosol
injection (SAI) on combined temperature and precipitation extremes in
Africa that can have greater negative impacts on human and the environment
than individual rainfall or temperature extremes. The examined compound
extremes included the dry (Rwarm?dry and Rcold?dry) and wet (Rwarm?wet and
Rcold?wet) modes assessed during the injection (SAI, 2050–2069) and
post-injection (postSAI, 2070–2089) periods compared with the historical
period (1986–2005). We found a significant projected change in the
occurrence of both wet and dry modes during SAI and postSAI related to the
historical period. The magnitude and sign of this change depend on the
season and the geographical location. During the SAI and postSAI, the wet
(Rwarm?wet and Rcold?wet) modes are projected to be significantly lower
while the dry modes are noted to increase in a large part of African
continent depending on the season and the geographical location and may
consequently leads to an increase of the droughts prone areas. The
termination effect is noted to reduce the occurrence of dry modes, whichmay
reduce the potential negative effects of the injection after halting. As
the effect may vary fromone region to another and according to the season,
it suggested assessing the key sector impacts of SAI. Thus, this change in
drymodes due to SAI could affect all activitieswhich depend on water
resources such as water supply, agriculture and food production, energy
demand, and production with adverse effects on health, security, and
sustainable development, but this needs to be assessed and quantified at
regional scales.

Identifying the regional emergence of climate patterns in the ARISE-SAI-1.5
simulations <https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/acc81a>

Labe, Z. M., Barnes, E. A., & Hurrell, J. W. (2023). Identifying the
regional emergence of climate patterns in the ARISE-SAI-1.5
simulations. *Environmental
Research Letters*, *18*(4), 044031.

*Abstract*

Stratospheric aerosol injection is a proposed form of solar climate
invention (SCI) that could potentially reduce the amount of future warming
from externally-forced climate change. However, more research is needed, as
there are significant uncertainties surrounding the possible impacts of
SCI, including unforeseen effects on regional climate patterns. In this
study, we consider a climate model simulation of the deployment of
stratospheric aerosols to maintain the global mean surface temperature at
1.5 ∘C above pre-industrial levels (ARISE-SAI-1.5). Leveraging two
different machine learning methods, we evaluate when the effects of SCI
would be detectable at regional scales. Specifically, we train a logistic
regression model to classify whether an annual mean map of near-surface
temperature or total precipitation is from future climate change under the
influence of SCI or not. We then design an artificial neural network to
predict how many years it has been since the deployment of SCI by inputting
the regional maps from the climate intervention scenario. In both detection
methods, we use feature attribution methods to spatially understand the
forced climate patterns that are important for the machine learning model
predictions. The differences in regional temperature signals are detectable
in under a decade for most regions in the SCI scenario compared to
greenhouse gas warming. However, the influence of SCI on regional
precipitation patterns is more difficult to distinguish due to the presence
of internal climate variability.

Towards a Non-Use Regime on Solar Geoengineering: Lessons from
International Law and Governance
<https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/transnational-environmental-law/article/towards-a-nonuse-regime-on-solar-geoengineering-lessons-from-international-law-and-governance/83A71F8002DC88049D9575790743D3A1>

Gupta, A., Biermann, F., van Driel, E., Bernaz, N., Jayaram, D., Kim, R.
E., ... & Wewerinke-Singh, M. (2024). Towards a Non-Use Regime on Solar
Geoengineering: Lessons from International Law and Governance. *Transnational
Environmental Law*, 1-32.

*Abstract*

In recent years, some scientists have called for research into and
potential development of ‘solar geoengineering’ technologies as an option
to counter global warming. Solar geoengineering refers to a set of
speculative techniques to reflect some incoming sunlight back into space,
for example, by continuously spraying reflective sulphur aerosols into the
stratosphere over several generations. Because of the significant
ecological, social, and political risks posed by such technologies, many
scholars and civil society organizations have urged governments to take
action to prohibit the development and deployment of solar geoengineering
techniques. In this article we take such calls for a prohibitory or a
non-use regime on solar geoengineering as a starting point to examine
existing international law and governance precedents that could guide the
development of such a regime. The precedents we examine include
international prohibitory and restrictive regimes that impose bans or
restrictions on chemical weapons, biological weapons, weather modification
technologies, anti-personnel landmines, substances that deplete the ozone
layer, trade in hazardous wastes, deep seabed mining, and mining in
Antarctica. We also assess emerging norms and soft law in anticipatory
governance of novel technologies, such as human cloning and gene editing.
While there is no blueprint for a solar geoengineering non-use regime in
international law, our analysis points to numerous specific elements on
which governments could draw to constrain or impose an outright prohibition
on the development of technologies for solar geoengineering, should they
opt to do so.

Considering intentional stratospheric dehydration for climate benefits
<https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adk0593>

Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Thornberry, T. D., Rollins, A. W., Rosenlof, K.
H., Portmann, R. W., ... & Ray, E. A. (2024). Considering intentional
stratospheric dehydration for climate benefits. *Science Advances*, *10*(9),
eadk0593.

*Abstract*

We introduce a climate intervention strategy focused on decreasing water
vapor (WV) concentrations near the tropopause and in the stratosphere to
increase outbound longwave radiation. The mechanism is the targeted
injection of ice-nucleating particles (INP) in air supersaturated with
respect to ice at high altitudes in the tropical entryway to the
stratosphere. Ice formation in this region is a critical control of
stratospheric WV. Recent airborne in situ data indicate that targeting only
a small fraction of air parcels in the region would be sufficient to
achieve substantial removal of water. This “intentional stratospheric
dehydration” (ISD) strategy would not counteract a large fraction of the
forcing from carbon dioxide but may contribute to a portfolio of climate
interventions by acting with different time and length scales of impact and
risk than other interventions that are already under consideration. We
outline the idea, its plausibility, technical hurdles, and side effects to
be considered.

<https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adk0593>
<https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2515-7620/ad2f71>
------------------------------
FUNDING OPPORTUNITYResearch programme to model impact of solar radiation
management
<https://www.ukri.org/news/research-programme-to-model-impact-of-solar-radiation-management/>

A new £10.5m, five-year research programme will deliver independent
risk-risk analyses to inform policymakers in the area of solar radiation
management (SRM).

------------------------------
WEB POSTSThe Degrees Initiative to host 2025 Global Forum on solar
radiation modification
<https://www.degrees.ngo/degrees-to-host-2025-global-forum-on-srm/> (The
Degrees Initiative)Emergency atmospheric geoengineering wouldn't save the
oceans
<https://phys.org/news/2024-02-emergency-atmospheric-geoengineering-wouldnt-oceans.html>
(Phys.org)*Safety fears stall U.N. bid to examine sun-blocking climate
change tech
<https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/safety-fears-stall-un-bid-examine-sun-blocking-climate-change-tech-2024-02-29/>
(Reuters)*Climate Vulnerable Nations Reject US-led Push for Solar
Geoengineering at UNEA-6
<https://www.ciel.org/news/ciel-response-to-geoengineering-srm-technology-rejection-unea-6/>
(CIEL)Canada Bets Big on Bill Gates' Solar Geoengineering Initiative to
Tame Global Warming
<https://bnnbreaking.com/world/canada/canada-bets-big-on-bill-gates-solar-geoengineering-initiative-to-tame-global-warming>
(BNN Breaking)Not such a bright idea: cooling the Earth by reflecting
sunlight back to space is a dangerous distraction
<https://theconversation.com/not-such-a-bright-idea-cooling-the-earth-by-reflecting-sunlight-back-to-space-is-a-dangerous-distraction-223353>
(The Conservation)Dehydrate the stratosphere to curb global warming?
Scientists float risky new strategy
<https://www.science.org/content/article/dehydrate-stratosphere-curb-global-warming-scientists-float-risky-new-strategy>
(Science)
<https://theconversation.com/not-such-a-bright-idea-cooling-the-earth-by-reflecting-sunlight-back-to-space-is-a-dangerous-distraction-223353>
------------------------------
OPINIONSAerosols and land surface geoengineering
<https://groups.google.com/g/geoengineering/c/MR10lmA5n14>UNEA6 fails to
adopt SRM resolution
<https://groups.google.com/g/geoengineering/c/5xGqaHPCX5E>
------------------------------
*PODCASTS*The Thorny Issue Of 1.5C | Outrage Optimism
<https://www.outrageandoptimism.org/episodes/the-thorny-issue-of-15c?hsLang=en>

“1.5C degrees is back in the news again as the recent Copernicus report
reported that the world had exceeded this politically agreed temperature
limit for the majority of 2023. But what does this mean? Do we abandon this
target and set a new one? Is it still useful to use this as our north star
in tackling the effects of man-made climate change? Is now the right time
to start a serious conversation about geo-engineering? Join Christiana, Tom
and Paul as they grapple with these difficult questions and their wider
implications.

Our guest this week is Dr. Michael E. Mann, Presidential Distinguished
Professor of Earth & Environmental Science, and Director of the Penn Center
for Science, Sustainability and the Media (PCSSM) at the University of
Pennsylvania. He lends us his expertise to discuss the liabilities and
implications of breaching the 1.5 degree ceiling, and what his latest legal
victory means for the ‘war on science’.”

Dimming the Sun | BBC Inside Science
<https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m001wqht>

“Switzerland has submitted a proposal to create a United Nations expert
group on solar geoengineering to inform governments and stakeholders. The
idea was discussed at the UN Environment Assembly in Nairobi, Kenya, this
week. Professor Aarti Gupta shares how, after tense negotiations, the
different member states could not agree, and the proposal was withdrawn.
Why is solar geoengineering a controversial issue? How would dimming the
sun even work? And should we consider it a genuine option in our fight
against climate change? Dr Pete Irvine and Professor Joanna Haigh join
presenter Marnie Chesterton in the studio to discuss.”

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh9_AdN8rDWzDGQrVzpUW7kQf9LaHYtcRZ41wObyxE6ttvQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to