*This item and others will be in the monthly “Solar Geoengineering Updates
Substack” newsletter:* https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------


https://europepmc.org/article/ppr/ppr823532

*Authors*
Diallo M , Dunker N , Eichinger R , Ploeger F , Garny H , Ern M , Ball W ,
Stenke A , Revell L , Aquila V , Tilmes S , Kinnison D , Shepherd T ,
Hegglin M

*18 March 2024*

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3985733/v1 PPR: PPR823532

*Abstract*
Mitigating global warming through stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI),
which aims to reproduce the cooling effects of tropical volcanoes on
surface climate, is emerging as a potential strategy for limiting
near–surface global warming to around 1.5–2◦C above pre–industrial levels.
However, knowledge of how the stratospheric circulation will respond to
SAI, and the resulting feedback on surface climate and weather, remain
highly uncertain. Here, we quantify the stratospheric circulation response
to the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption and compare its response to a future
global warming scenario with and without tropical SAI. We show that the
shallow branch of the stratospheric circulation slows down in climate
models and observations following tropical aerosol perturbations due to
reduced lower stratospheric planetary and gravity wave breaking. However,
the depth and strength of the deep branch response is highly uncertain.
Climate models show a strengthening of the deep branch due to enhanced
middle/upper stratospheric planetary and gravity wave breaking, contrasting
with the observed weakening of the deep branch induced by reduced planetary
and gravity wave forcing. As interest in SAI continues to grow, our results
demonstrate the urgent need to study the impact of gravity/planetary wave
uncertainty on ozone recovery, surface climate and weather.

*Source: Europe PMC*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh9_tVSMNMyGRysDRi2WY67JNH0hcF%2BG05GRGDYkuczKTDg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to