https://essopenarchive.org/doi/full/10.22541/essoar.172253206.64448528/v1

*Authors*
Linus Boselius, Alistair Duffey, Peter James Irvine

*Cite as:* Linus Boselius, Alistair Duffey, Peter James Irvine. Peak
Shaving with Solar Radiation Management Would Shorten Global Temperature
Overshoot. ESS Open Archive . August 01, 2024.
DOI: 10.22541/essoar.172253206.64448528/v1

*01 August 2024*

*Abstract*
Projected rates of emissions reductions are unlikely to keep global
temperatures from crossing the Paris Agreement temperature targets.
Large-scale carbon dioxide removal (CDR) could help recover a target
temperature after it has been exceeded, producing an overshoot scenario.
Solar radiation management (SRM) is the proposal to cool the planet by
increasing the reflection of incoming solar radiation. It could be used in
an overshoot scenario for peak shaving, where SRM is deployed to maintain a
temperature target during the overshoot. Here, we quantify the effect of
peak shaving on the duration of the overshoot using an adapted extension of
the SSP2-4.5 scenario and an ensemble of variants of the FaIR simple
climate model. We find a substantial reduction in overshoot duration, which
ranges from ∼5% for decadal overshoots up to ∼20% for multi-century
overshoots. The shortening is predominantly driven by the ocean response to
peak shaving. Peak shaving results in lower ocean temperatures relative to
the overshoot scenario, inducing a stronger surface temperature response to
decreasing and negative emissions, driving overshoot shortening. Our
results also indicate that peak shaving with SRM would reduce the
cumulative net negative emissions needed to end temperature overshoot by
∼27%. Thus, SRM, when deployed as a complement to emissions reductions and
CDR, could end overshoot decades earlier than otherwise and at a
substantially lower cost.

Source:

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh9-UGagxX9J-S_coL0OBmGeu4cZ18H9oQPSiJduuZGz52g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to