https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/adba01/meta

*Authors*
Lauren Wheeler, Benjamin Wagman, Wake Smith, Peter Davies, Benjamin Cook,
Sarah Brunell, Andrew Glen, Diana Hackenburg, Jessica Lien, Lyndsay Shand

Accepted Manuscript online *25 February 2025*

DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/adba01

*Abstract*
The Arctic is warming faster than the rest of the globe, posing risks to
climate tipping elements such as the collapse of the Greenland Ice Sheet,
winter Arctic sea ice loss, weakening of the Atlantic Meridional
Overturning Circulation, and permafrost collapse. Stratospheric Aerosol
Injection (SAI) has shown potential to ameliorate these effects by reducing
surface temperatures. Due to the potential for an asymmetric hemispheric
response in precipitation, Arctic-only SAI is not recommended. Given the
challenges associated with an Antarctic SAI program, including the lack of
nearby large airports, however, we designed and simulated an Arctic-only
logistically constrained SAI scenario, considering limitations imposed by
factors affecting the planning, execution, and management of operations.
Our scenario is constrained by aircraft development and delivery timelines.
SAI deployment begins in 2032 and increases to a maximum annual injection
of 6.7 TgSO2 by 2053 through 2070. The scenario is simulated in a modified
version of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SMv2). Results
indicate that Arctic-only SAI can reduce Northern Hemisphere temperatures
and slow sea ice loss, though the early years of deployment may show
limited cooling due to low ramp-in injection magnitudes. The Arctic-only
SAI introduces minimal impact on Southern Hemisphere temperatures but
significant shifts in the hydrologic cycle, particularly around the
equator. Southern Hemisphere changes are low within the first two decades,
suggesting that asymmetries in Arctic-only SAI deployment could be
sustained without severe adverse climate impacts for the first couple of
decades. These asymmetries matter given the challenges associated with an
Antarctic SAI program. Our findings underscore the necessity of
incorporating logistical constraints on deployment and the need for
multi-model assessments in the evaluation of polar SAI scenarios. This
approach would ensure a strong scientific understanding of polar SAI and
facilitates policy and decision-maker understanding of the risks and
benefits of SAI.

*Source: IOP Science*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh9-GSFB1_ZMOEDit1B0yn-mRpPvgy_12Z2uVFiqm%3Dq0sug%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to