https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-journal-of-risk-regulation/article/geoengineering-the-precautionary-principle-and-the-search-for-climate-safety/44E99CAA15A38F750D8A7DBB1BA2E15F
*Authors* Gareth Davies and Julie Vinders *14 March 2025* *Abstract* This article considers the application of the precautionary principle as understood in EU law to EU decision-making on geoengineering, in particular solar geoengineering. It finds that the situation is riddled with more complexities than first appears; (i) the principle is used to argue against research, even though more research is usually itself seen as precautionary response; (ii) the risks of research are claimed to lie in its political impact, whereas the principle is traditionally applied to direct physical risks; (iii) while there are legitimate precautionary arguments against geoengineering, it is itself put forward as a precautionary measure and there are precautionary arguments in favour too. Drawing on case law and scholarship we conclude that the precautionary principle can nevertheless be applied and will lead to a procedural requirement to do comprehensive reviews of relevant scientific knowledge before decision-making. This leaves wide – but not unbounded – discretion but may still be valuable in providing a frame for reasoned public debate. We also apply our findings to the recent expert reports on Solar Radiation Modification and show that they have failed to apply precaution correctly. *Source: Cambridge University Press* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh99c6LCXRLGiyW%3DAjiS%3DvhCchv35Ctf3OANs1ey3PTjvLQ%40mail.gmail.com.
