https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927825000838

*Authors*
Ze-Qian FENG, Mou Leong TAN, Liew JUNENG, Mari R. TYE, Li-Li XIA, Fei ZHANG

*23 April 2025*

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2025.04.009

*Abstract*
Solar Radiation Modification (SRM) has been proposed to reduce global
temperatures by reflecting more solar radiation into space, but its effects
on precipitation extremes across Southeast Asia remain uncertain. This
study evaluates the impacts of two SRM strategies on precipitation extremes
in Southeast Asia, using the multi-model ensemble mean from five climate
models in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6
(GeoMIP6). Under a high-emission scenario (SSP585), two SRM approaches are
tested: injecting sulfur dioxide (G6sulfur) into the stratosphere and
reducing the solar constant (G6solar) to maintain radiative forcing at the
level of a moderate-emission scenario (SSP245). Bilinear interpolation and
linear scaling were used to downscale and bias-correct daily precipitation
data before calculating precipitation extreme indices, respectively. The
results show that G6sulfur causes more regional variation in annual total
and mean wet day precipitation, the average daily precipitation on days
with ≥1 mm rainfall, compared to G6solar. In areas like central Borneo,
northern mainland Southeast Asia, and eastern Indonesia, the annual maximum
1-day precipitation per year is projected to increase by 30%‒50% under
SSP585 relative to the historical 1995-2014 baseline period but this rise
could be reduced to around 20% by SSP245, G6sulfur, or G6solar. G6sulfur
has less influence on continuous wet and dry spells than G6solar, yielding
results closer to SSP585. Both SRM strategies lower the projected increase
in heavy precipitation days, except in areas like East Coast Peninsular
Malaysia, Nusantara Indonesia, and East Timor. In conclusion, SRM may
effectively mitigate increases in extreme precipitation events in most of
Southeast Asia, but G6solar provides a more consistent reduction, while
G6sulfur shows more complex spatial responses.

*Source: ScienceDirect*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh9-bosRA8sXOZNzKUervcXsf7K7Rqe_C3qwbuqgDGjPUYg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to