Hi Luca and D. Ravat Thanks for your responses. I had a look at the 2006 paper from Li. I see that in the case of depth estimates for a vertical contact model the 3D analytic signal degrades to 2D and in that case it doesn't depend on inclination, but in all other cases it does depend on inclination. And since source bodies are 3 dimensional and contacts are almost never really vertical its probably not a good approach.
Regards, Doug On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:53 AM, lucaingv <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Doug, > Analytic signal and related peaks location are depending of inclination > and declination of Earth's Magnetic Field, so the AS procedure may involve > a first RTP calculation but only in the case this transformation results > stable. > > I suggest you to read the very helpful paper by Xiong LI > > > Li X. 2006. Understanding 3D analytic signal amplitude. Geophysics 71(2): > L13-L16. > > Best Regards > > Luca > --- > > Forum archives can be accessed here: > http://lyris.geosoft.com/read/?fourm=geonet > You are currently subscribed to geonet as: [email protected]. > To subscribe or unsubscribe from any of our forums, select the User Forum > selection on the Geosoft Community page: > http://www.geosoft.com/support/community > --- Forum archives can be accessed here: http://lyris.geosoft.com/read/?fourm=geonet You are currently subscribed to geonet as: [email protected]. To subscribe or unsubscribe from any of our forums, select the User Forum selection on the Geosoft Community page: http://www.geosoft.com/support/community
