Beside longer wavelength magnetic data other available datasets that might be
tried to crosscheck the mag result depths are regional gravity, satellite
gravity datasets are freely available on the web with Grace being just one
example, seismic surface wave shear velocity models (coarse in some areas) may
also help, some of these data too are obtainable on the web, and regional MT
studies, Alan Jones and his teams have published several papers with images
from different continents, there may be some regional depth inferences in these
MT papers. Ed CunionRed Rocks Geophysical Consulting13224 W Utah
CircleLakewood, CO 80228 USA email: [email protected]
On Monday, May 18, 2015 6:49 AM, "solomonjanjaro
<[email protected]>" <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear all.
Please I need help on different methods of determining crustal thickness using
aeromagnetic data.
1. I have upward continued filter on my residual data and window a block of
66x66 km and I have 16 blocks of this size over my study area and I have also
used this formula Zb=2Zo - Zt
Where Zb = curie depth
Zo = depth to centroid
Zt= depth to top
But want other methods to confirm result.
Thank you
Solomon Nehemiah Yusuf
PhD student( Mautech Nigeria) --- Forum archives can be accessed here:
http://lyris.geosoft.com/read/?forum=geonet You are currently subscribed to
geonet as: [email protected]. To subscribe or unsubscribe from any of our
forums, select the User Forum selection on the Geosoft Community page:
http://www.geosoft.com/support/community/forums/register/
---
Forum archives can be accessed here: http://lyris.geosoft.com/read/?forum=geonet
You are currently subscribed to geonet as: [email protected].
To subscribe or unsubscribe from any of our forums, select the User Forum
selection on the Geosoft Community page:
http://www.geosoft.com/support/community/forums/register/
