Hi Solomon, just sticking to generalities here a few more mag depth 
determination methods beside upward continuation are listed below and available 
in Geosoft or found in the USGS GXs written for Geosoft- various other 
frequency/wavelength filtering techniquesEuler deconvolution and other similar 
depth to magnetic source techniquesmatch filtering-power spectra technique 
(USGS suite)3D voxel inversion (Voxi)parametric modeling (PotentQ module for 
Geosoft)  Geosoft also provides the GM-SYS module for the creation of of more 
detailed & complex magnetic models.  there will be a few other methods and 
proprietary or public domain softwares beside the above that could be tried 
that can crosscheck mag upward continuation depth approximation results,  Ed    
 


     On Monday, May 18, 2015 10:12 AM, "solomonjanjaro 
<[email protected]>" <[email protected]> wrote:
   

 ED CUNION,
In a situation where I have only aeromagnetic data to use.....which other 
methods do I use? Please  suggest. 
SolomonOn 18 May 2015 17:05, "edcunion &lt;[email protected]&gt;" 
<[email protected]> wrote:

Beside longer wavelength magnetic data other available datasets that might be 
tried to crosscheck the mag result depths are regional gravity, satellite 
gravity datasets are freely available on the web with Grace being just one 
example, seismic surface wave shear velocity models (coarse in some areas) may 
also help, some of these data too are obtainable on the web, and regional MT 
studies, Alan Jones and his teams have published several papers with images 
from different continents, there may be some regional depth inferences in these 
MT papers.   Ed CunionRed Rocks Geophysical Consulting13224 W Utah 
CircleLakewood, CO 80228 USA  email: [email protected]


     On Monday, May 18, 2015 6:49 AM, "solomonjanjaro 
<[email protected]>" <[email protected]> wrote:
   

 Dear all.
Please I need help on different methods of determining crustal thickness using 
aeromagnetic data.
1. I have upward continued filter on my residual data and window a block of 
66x66 km and I have 16 blocks of this size over my study area and I have also 
used this formula Zb=2Zo - Zt
Where  Zb = curie depth
          Zo = depth to  centroid
          Zt= depth to top
But want other methods to confirm result.
Thank you
Solomon Nehemiah Yusuf
PhD student( Mautech Nigeria) ---  Forum archives can be accessed here: 
http://lyris.geosoft.com/read/?forum=geonet  You are currently subscribed to 
geonet as: [email protected].  To subscribe or unsubscribe from any of our 
forums, select the User Forum selection on the Geosoft Community page: 
http://www.geosoft.com/support/community/forums/register/

    ---  Forum archives can be accessed here: 
http://lyris.geosoft.com/read/?forum=geonet  You are currently subscribed to 
geonet as: [email protected].  To subscribe or unsubscribe from any of 
our forums, select the User Forum selection on the Geosoft Community page: 
http://www.geosoft.com/support/community/forums/register/
 ---  Forum archives can be accessed here: 
http://lyris.geosoft.com/read/?forum=geonet  You are currently subscribed to 
geonet as: [email protected].  To subscribe or unsubscribe from any of our 
forums, select the User Forum selection on the Geosoft Community page: 
http://www.geosoft.com/support/community/forums/register/

  
---

Forum archives can be accessed here: http://lyris.geosoft.com/read/?forum=geonet
You are currently subscribed to geonet as: [email protected].
To subscribe or unsubscribe from any of our forums, select the User Forum 
selection on the Geosoft Community page: 
http://www.geosoft.com/support/community/forums/register/

Reply via email to