On 6/25/10 3:13 PM, Sebastian Benthall wrote: > Good point. > > I'll try to turn this thread into a feature spec draft, if that's OK. will you be so kind? :) I'd like to help, not sure what tool you do prefer, sphinx, wiki, etherpad?
> > That will also help us integrate with our (upcoming) implementation roadmap > and also look for client funding to help with these improvements. > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Gabriel Roldan<[email protected]> wrote: > >> we can figure out the workflow details later. >> What I'd want is for us to lay down a clear scope, something with can >> easily track progress against. >> How should we proceed? use cases -> feature specs -> tech spec?
