On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Jeffrey Johnson <[email protected]>wrote:

> David,
>
> Can you describe these "other modifications". I've never run into
> trouble doing it this way, and just saying its not a good idea to do
> it this way is just not a good enough reason for me not to continue
> doing it.


I don't think the users' mailing list is the appropriate place for that.
 Feel free to diff the sources of geoserver's web/app module with GeoNode's
geoserver-geonode-ext.


> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:07 PM, David Winslow <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I don't recommend just dropping the geonode-geoserver-ext JAR into a
> > standard GeoServer installation.  The WAR file that we distribute has
> some
> > modifications beyond just adding the geoserver-geonode-ext JAR.  WIthout
> > them, it is non-deterministic whether or not the GeoNode integration with
> > the GeoServer security system actually takes effect.  (Actually, it used
> to
> > be non-deterministic but I think now it just doesn't work.)
>
> I did this as recently as monday, and it certainly did work, and in
> fact, I carefully tested that the GeoNode based security most
> certainly was working.
>
> > The GeoNode WAR is built from GeoServer nightly jars and has all bugfixes
> > that have gone into GeoServer 2.1.3.  I also put together a branch to
> bring
> > GeoNode up to the GeoServer 2.2
> > series: https://github.com/dwins/geonode/tree/geoserver-2.2  Please try
> one
> > of those instead of trying to "geonode-ize" a regular GeoServer.
>
> Is there a reason that this geoserver-2.2 branch hasnt been submitted
> as a pull request and pulled onto master yet? Seems like it makes
> sense for us to get GeoNode up to speed with current GeoServer
> development sooner rather than later.
>

When a stable release of GeoServer 2.2 is published by the GeoServer team,
I will verify that this branch still compiles.  If so, we'll update to
GeoServer 2.2 at that time.  For now though, GeoServer 2.2 is still
considered unstable by the GeoServer developers and I don't think it's
appropriate for inclusion as the default in GeoNode.

--
David Winslow
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/

Reply via email to