Hi All, Just wanted to give this thread a bump. We are looking to finish collecting feedback ASAP, so if you have any other input you want to be considered in this round of discussion, please send it in quickly (before the end of the weekend).
We will be continuing this process and discussion, so you will have more opportunities to participate. Jeff On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Rolando Peñate <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Thanks to those who filled out the user survey; if you haven't thrown in > your 2¢ we're still accepting feedback through the end of the month. > > In the same vein, I've linked to some initial wireframes created by Naomi of > SpatialDev as part of a general UI/UX review for GeoNode being sponsored as > part of the OpenDRI project at the World Bank. These are still in the > initial stages but we're sending them out to solicit feedback about the > high-level experience to help inform what information and actions should be > prioritized as we refine various interfaces. > > Wireframes organized by approach > Wireframes organized by page > > We're especially interested in feedback that focuses on "big picture" > questions (eg, is GeoNode about maps, authors, data, or something else? > what significant information or actions are missing from these wireframes if > GeoNode is "about data"? are the most important goals of users exploring a > GeoNode site being met?). While feedback about small-scale interactions (eg, > "this information should be in tabs" or "what does this pop-up look like?") > is welcome, those sorts of questions will be better addressed during the > next round of wireframes. > > We're looking forward to see what discussion develops on the list but ask > that everyone remember that GeoNode represents a wide-community of users > with varied goals. If you'd prefer to said feedback off-list, send it along > to [email protected] and we'll be sure to incorporate it into the > review. Please submit any feedback by April 1st. > > Thanks, > Rolando
