Hi there, I did not have a chance to discuss the wireframes with my team and so I can't offer detailed feedback yet, but I can defiantly say that the wireframes are very impressive and this is exactly the direction that we would like to move. Cheers, Ben
On Mar 30, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Reinier Battenberg wrote: > > Hi, > > I thought they were awesome. The only functionality (but i guess that is not > wireframe business) i missed was to create a very simple page. Hello, this is > abc, and we xyz. > > I liked the first approach from the appraoch pdf best. if thats worth > anything. > > nice weekend everyone! > > rgds, > reinier > > > On Friday 30 March 2012 08:56:35 Jeffrey Johnson wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Just wanted to give this thread a bump. We are looking to finish >> collecting feedback ASAP, so if you have any other input you want to >> be considered in this round of discussion, please send it in quickly >> (before the end of the weekend). >> >> We will be continuing this process and discussion, so you will have >> more opportunities to participate. >> >> Jeff >> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Rolando Peñate <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hey everyone, >>> >>> Thanks to those who filled out the user survey; if you haven't thrown in >>> your 2¢ we're still accepting feedback through the end of the month. >>> >>> In the same vein, I've linked to some initial wireframes created by >>> Naomi of SpatialDev as part of a general UI/UX review for GeoNode being >>> sponsored as part of the OpenDRI project at the World Bank. These are >>> still in the initial stages but we're sending them out to solicit >>> feedback about the high-level experience to help inform what >>> information and actions should be prioritized as we refine various >>> interfaces. >>> >>> Wireframes organized by approach >>> Wireframes organized by page >>> >>> We're especially interested in feedback that focuses on "big picture" >>> questions (eg, is GeoNode about maps, authors, data, or something else? >>> what significant information or actions are missing from these >>> wireframes if GeoNode is "about data"? are the most important goals of >>> users exploring a GeoNode site being met?). While feedback about >>> small-scale interactions (eg, "this information should be in tabs" or >>> "what does this pop-up look like?") is welcome, those sorts of >>> questions will be better addressed during the next round of wireframes. >>> >>> We're looking forward to see what discussion develops on the list but >>> ask >>> that everyone remember that GeoNode represents a wide-community of users >>> with varied goals. If you'd prefer to said feedback off-list, send it >>> along to [email protected] and we'll be sure to incorporate it >>> into the review. Please submit any feedback by April 1st. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Rolando > -- > rgds, > > Reinier Battenberg > Director > Mountbatten Ltd. > www.mountbatten.net > tel: +256 758 801749 > twitter: @batje
