Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Paul Ramsey wrote:
It may seem precipitate to talk about 3.1 when we've spend over a year
in 3.0.0rcX, but Ben's work on the JTS upgrade and PreparedGeometry are
ready to see the light of day, and it makes sense to put them into
trunk. Which implies that 3.0.x should go into a branch. And probably be
released "officially". Discussion?
+1 for releasing 3.0.0rc5 as 3.0.0 and copying to branches/3.0.0
Are we going to keep fixing bugs in branches/3.0.0, following similar
procedure as GDAL does?
Mateusz,
Charlie seems to doubt the need for this, but I think it is good for us to
treat 3.0 as a stable branch so we can put out a 3.0.1 if we fine some
significant errors in the next few months before Ben's (3.1) work is complete.
GEOS is a bedrock component for a lot of packages so I think at least some
degree of maintenance of a stable branch is called for.
IMHO.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
_______________________________________________
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
