Charlie Savage wrote:
Are we going to keep fixing bugs in branches/3.0.0, following similar
procedure as GDAL does?
Mateusz,
Charlie seems to doubt the need for this, but I think it is good for
us to
treat 3.0 as a stable branch so we can put out a 3.0.1 if we fine some
significant errors in the next few months before Ben's (3.1) work is
complete.
Its not that I doubt its a good idea. Its that I doubt there are the
people to actually maintain the branch. If there are, then by all means
there should be a branch.
Charlie,
I guess I'm optimistic that the osgeo transition will also correspond with
a broader and more "enabled" developer community. But honestly, it does not
seem likely there will be a lot of activity in the stable branch.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
_______________________________________________
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
