Great idea Paul. I can do that while cleaning up the prototype for sure. I'll open the ticket and post up what I've got for a more detailed look.
Chuck On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 11:46 -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: > I'd be interested in seeing more. I think I "get" this, and there have > to be more folks w/ this problem. Could we reduce the two-apis > duplication somewhat by having the old API call into the new API, and > just stick the handle into a global in that case? That way we have > twice as much API still, but about the same amount of C/C++ gluecode. > > P. > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Chuck Thibert > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have been prototyping a thread safe CAPI. I have attached a simple > > proposal/design intent. I have sample executables and test data that > > will illustrate the thread issues but I don't want to flood the mailing > > list with them. If the proposal attached looks decent to you all I'll > > create a new ticket and attach the code I have to that. > > > > Thanks, > > Chuck > > > > _______________________________________________ > > geos-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > geos-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
