On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 16:32 -0400, Chuck Thibert wrote: > Thanks for the great feedback Frank. I will implement the suggestions. > As for the TS versions of functions that don't quite need it... Mostly > did those for completeness atm and proof of concept. > > I'll work on a proper RFC in the next day or so for sure. > > Chuck
Hi Chuck, Looks reasonable. My only comment would be that it makes sense to mark the thread-safe versions of the functions with a _r prefix so that it matches the normal UNIX convention, e.g. initGEOS() becomes initGEOS_r() etc... ATB, Mark. _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
