Particularly with the relative impedance level of getting an OSGeo account, having the GH issues seems a good thing, particularly if the GH-enabled people are willing to work them. You get to run your bespoke non-Evil infra, can we manage the Evil infra on the same basis?
P > On Feb 12, 2020, at 5:02 PM, Daniel Baston <dbas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I enabled them after some discussion on IRC in November. The thought was they > are a harmless way to collect user feedback, and a preferable alternative to > ignoring users that do not have an OSGeo account. If something is worth > ticketing, such as a fix that needs to be applied to a stable branch, I am > happy to copy-paste the content of the GitHub issue into Trac myself. > > You've gone ahead and closed them, though? > > Dan > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 3:59 AM Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > Since when are we accepting issue reports on GitHub ? > I was surprised to see them, as I'm pretty sure I had > them disabled when I first started the mirror ? > > --strk; > _______________________________________________ > geos-devel mailing list > geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel > _______________________________________________ > geos-devel mailing list > geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
