geos-devel  

Messages by Thread

• [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Regina Obe
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Daniel Baston
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Martin Davis
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Martin Davis
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Martin Davis
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Sandro Santilli
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Sandro Santilli
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Martin Davis
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Joris Van den Bossche
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Joris Van den Bossche
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Joris Van den Bossche
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Joris Van den Bossche
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Martin Davis
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Daniel Baston
  • Re: [geos-devel] Update to 3.9? Martin Davis
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1074: Setting precision on some but not all geometries causes intersection results to use the smallest nonzero gridSize GEOS
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1073: Feature: add support for pkg-config for GEOS C API (only) GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1073: Feature: add support for pkg-config for GEOS C API (only) GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1073: Feature: add support for pkg-config for GEOS C API (only) GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1073: Feature: add support for pkg-config for GEOS C API (only) GEOS
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1072: Setting precision of topologically invalid polygon returns incomplete results when preserving topology GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1072: Setting precision of topologically invalid polygon returns incomplete results when preserving topology GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1072: Setting precision of topologically invalid polygon returns incomplete results when preserving topology GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1072: Setting precision of topologically invalid polygon returns incomplete results when preserving topology GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1072: Setting precision of topologically invalid polygon returns incomplete results when preserving topology GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1072: Setting precision of topologically invalid polygon returns incomplete results when preserving topology GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1072: Setting precision of topologically invalid polygon returns incomplete results when preserving topology GEOS
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1071: Setting lower precision of polygon always collapses polygon GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1071: Setting lower precision of polygon always collapses polygon GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1071: Setting lower precision of polygon always collapses polygon GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1071: Setting lower precision of polygon always collapses polygon GEOS
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1068: Fix CMake Windows install: keep geos-config.cmake GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1068: Fix CMake Windows install: keep geos-config.cmake GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1068: Fix CMake Windows install: keep geos-config.cmake GEOS
• [geos-devel] Port of PostGIS ST_Subdivide to GEOS / downstream libraries Brendan Ward
  • Re: [geos-devel] Port of PostGIS ST_Subdivide to GEOS / downstream libraries Daniel Baston
• [geos-devel] GH Actions Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] GH Actions Sandro Santilli
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1064: Topology preserve simplify: unexpected behavior on similar polygons GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1064: Topology preserve simplify: unexpected behavior on similar polygons GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1064: Topology preserve simplify: unexpected behavior on similar polygons GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1064: Topology preserve simplify: unexpected behavior on similar polygons GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1064: Topology preserve simplify: unexpected behavior on similar polygons GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1064: Topology preserve simplify: unexpected behavior on similar polygons GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1064: Topology preserve simplify: unexpected behavior on similar polygons GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1064: Topology preserve simplify: unexpected behavior on similar polygons GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1064: Topology preserve simplify: unexpected behavior on similar polygons GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1064: Topology preserve simplify: unexpected behavior on similar polygons GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1064: Topology preserve simplify: unexpected behavior on similar polygons GEOS via geos-devel
• [geos-devel] OverlayNG as Default Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] OverlayNG as Default Regina Obe
  • Re: [geos-devel] OverlayNG as Default Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] OverlayNG as Default Daniel Baston
  • Re: [geos-devel] OverlayNG as Default Paul Ramsey
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1063: Port OverlayNG Z handling from JTS GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1063: Port OverlayNG Z handling from JTS GEOS
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1061: Cannot build GEOS on Windows 10 under MinGW GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1061: Cannot build GEOS on Windows 10 under MinGW GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1061: Cannot build GEOS on Windows 10 under MinGW GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1061: Cannot build GEOS on Windows 10 under MinGW GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1061: Cannot build GEOS on Windows 10 under MinGW GEOS
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1060: Cannot build GEOS on Windows 10 under MinGW GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1060: Cannot build GEOS on Windows 10 under MinGW GEOS
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1059: Cannot build GEOS on Windows 10 under MinGW GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1059: Cannot build GEOS on Windows 10 under MinGW GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1059: Cannot build GEOS on Windows 10 under MinGW GEOS
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1057: GEOSClipByRect might return mixed dimension geometries GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1057: GEOSClipByRect might return mixed dimension geometries GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1057: GEOSClipByRect might return mixed dimension geometries GEOS
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1056: GEOSClipByRect: Incorrect line clipping GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1056: GEOSClipByRect: Incorrect line clipping GEOS
• [geos-devel] Unit testing Overlay operations Martin Davis
  • Re: [geos-devel] Unit testing Overlay operations Regina Obe
• [geos-devel] Is Overlay-NG active? Roger Bivand
  • Re: [geos-devel] Is Overlay-NG active? Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] Is Overlay-NG active? Regina Obe
  • Re: [geos-devel] Is Overlay-NG active? Roger Bivand
  • Re: [geos-devel] Is Overlay-NG active? Regina Obe
  • Re: [geos-devel] Is Overlay-NG active? Roger Bivand
  • Re: [geos-devel] Is Overlay-NG active? Roger Bivand
  • Re: [geos-devel] Is Overlay-NG active? Sandro Santilli
  • Re: [geos-devel] Is Overlay-NG active? Roger Bivand
  • Re: [geos-devel] Is Overlay-NG active? Paul Ramsey
  • [geos-devel] Testing OverlayNG robustness in R-sf Martin Davis
  • Re: [geos-devel] Testing OverlayNG robustness in R-sf Roger Bivand
  • Re: [geos-devel] Testing OverlayNG robustness in R-sf Martin Davis
  • Re: [geos-devel] Testing OverlayNG robustness in R-sf Roger Bivand
  • Re: [geos-devel] Is Overlay-NG active? Roger Bivand
• [geos-devel] Checking GEOS master (state 8 October) Roger Bivand
  • Re: [geos-devel] Checking GEOS master (state 8 October) Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] Checking GEOS master (state 8 October) Roger Bivand
  • Re: [geos-devel] Checking GEOS master (state 8 October) Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] Checking GEOS master (state 8 October) Roger Bivand
  • Re: [geos-devel] Checking GEOS master (state 8 October) Martin Davis
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1054: BuildArea behavior changed intentional? and when did it happen GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1054: BuildArea behavior changed intentional? and when did it happen GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1054: BuildArea behavior changed intentional? and when did it happen GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1054: BuildArea behavior changed intentional? and when did it happen GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1054: BuildArea behavior changed intentional? and when did it happen GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1054: BuildArea behavior changed intentional? and when did it happen GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1054: BuildArea behavior changed intentional? and when did it happen GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1054: BuildArea behavior changed intentional? and when did it happen GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1054: BuildArea behavior changed intentional? and when did it happen GEOS
• [geos-devel] FW: When did ST_BuildArea change Regina Obe
• [geos-devel] Motion: stop brain damage and move finally to github as primary repository Even Rouault
  • Re: [geos-devel] Motion: stop brain damage and move finally to github as primary repository Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] Motion: stop brain damage and move finally to github as primary repository Sandro Santilli
  • Re: [geos-devel] Motion: stop brain damage and move finally to github as primary repository Greg Troxel
• [geos-devel] Ticket #1050: Debug assertion failure when buiding GEOS under windows with MSVC /MTd flag -who can help Regina Obe
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1052: Thread safety: C API contexts use shared GeometryFactory without any refCount synchronization GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1052: Thread safety: C API contexts use shared GeometryFactory without any refCount synchronization GEOS
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1051: overlayng::EdgeMerger::merge(): Assertion `baseEdge->size() == edge->size()' failed. GEOS
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1049: Inconsistency with POINT(nan nan) GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1049: Inconsistency with POINT(nan nan) GEOS
• [geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review Sandro Santilli
  • Re: [geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review Sandro Santilli
  • Re: [geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review Joris Van den Bossche
  • Re: [geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review Martin Davis
  • Re: [geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review Sandro Santilli
  • Re: [geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review Sandro Santilli
  • Re: [geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review (GDAL feedback) Even Rouault
  • Re: [geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review (GDAL feedback) Martin Davis
  • Re: [geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review (GDAL feedback) Paul Ramsey
  • Re: [geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review (GDAL feedback) Paul Ramsey
• [geos-devel] Complexity of algorithms Zachary Déziel
  • Re: [geos-devel] Complexity of algorithms Martin Davis
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1048: WKB representation of POINT EMPTY has 3 dimensions GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1048: WKB representation of POINT EMPTY has 3 dimensions GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1048: WKB representation of POINT EMPTY has 3 dimensions GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1048: WKB representation of POINT EMPTY has 3 dimensions GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1048: WKB representation of POINT EMPTY has 3 dimensions GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1048: WKB representation of POINT EMPTY has 3 dimensions GEOS
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1047: GEOS Panics on GeometryCollection with 1 MultiPolygon object GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1047: GEOS Panics on GeometryCollection with 1 MultiPolygon object GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1047: GEOS Panics on GeometryCollection with 1 MultiPolygon object GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1047: GEOS Panics on GeometryCollection with 1 MultiPolygon object GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1047: GEOS Panics on GeometryCollection with 1 MultiPolygon object GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1047: GEOS Panics on GeometryCollection with 1 MultiPolygon object GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1047: GEOS Panics on GeometryCollection with 1 MultiPolygon object GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1047: GEOS Panics on GeometryCollection with 1 MultiPolygon object GEOS
• [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1046: Unary union does not combine all parts GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1046: Unary union does not combine all parts GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1046: Unary union does not combine all parts GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1046: Unary union does not combine all parts GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1046: Unary union does not combine all parts GEOS
  • Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #1046: Unary union does not combine all parts GEOS

• Earlier messages
• Later messages