On Sun, 10 Jan 2021, Sean Gillies wrote:
Hi Roger and all,
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 12:25 PM Roger Bivand <roger.biv...@nhh.no> wrote:
...
The RFC mentions the preferences of commmitters; this is wrong-headed,
because the actually useful feedback comes from those in R/Python/etc. who
may be able to find regressions, but who will stop testing before release
if building from the repo or from source in general gets harder. Then you
risk making releases which cause havoc downstream, because you are making
it harder for people like me to build from source. What the committers
prefer will decide this, but it isn't wise.
Roger
I can't speak for any other downstream projects or packagers, but the
Shapely project won't be terribly inconvenienced by a complete switch to
Cmake.
Sean: Thanks, this is useful.
Cmake proponents: apart from the reservations raised by packagers, why for
me does rm -rf _build not lead to
mkdir _build && cd _build && cmake .. && make
taking the same time when repeated compare to the first time through? What
else do I need to delete to distclean the previous build? Is what I am
seeing from searching correct, that cmake squirrels stuff away and does
not offer any distclean to zero the build completely?
How can one be sure that stale stuff is not hanging around when using
cmake .. in an empty _build in the local git repo?
Roger
--
Roger Bivand
Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics,
Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway.
voice: +47 55 95 93 55; e-mail: roger.biv...@nhh.no
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-6140
https://scholar.google.no/citations?user=AWeghB0AAAAJ&hl=en
_______________________________________________
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
