On lundi 11 janvier 2021 10:09:58 CET Roger Bivand wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jan 2021, Sean Gillies wrote: > > Hi Roger and all, > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 12:25 PM Roger Bivand <roger.biv...@nhh.no> wrote: > ... > > >> The RFC mentions the preferences of commmitters; this is wrong-headed, > >> because the actually useful feedback comes from those in R/Python/etc. > >> who > >> may be able to find regressions, but who will stop testing before release > >> if building from the repo or from source in general gets harder. Then you > >> risk making releases which cause havoc downstream, because you are making > >> it harder for people like me to build from source. What the committers > >> prefer will decide this, but it isn't wise. > >> > >> Roger > > > > I can't speak for any other downstream projects or packagers, but the > > Shapely project won't be terribly inconvenienced by a complete switch to > > Cmake. > > Sean: Thanks, this is useful. > > Cmake proponents: apart from the reservations raised by packagers, why for > me does rm -rf _build not lead to > > mkdir _build && cd _build && cmake .. && make > > taking the same time when repeated compare to the first time through?
Operating system level I/O caching maybe. -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
