On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 04:56:43PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: > > > > On Nov 2, 2021, at 4:35 PM, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 04:26:16PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: > >> > >> Let's just say we'll take contributions whereever, like now, but > >> honestly, we take what we see, so it's a little disingenuous to say > >> "sure, we take contribs at all these 5 places!"). So I take GH and Trac > >> and email. I don' t ever look at gitea or gitlab mirrors so they aren't a > >> great place to put things if you want me personally to pick them up. > > > > That's why I care about Trac. I'd like to ONLY look in trac, you file > > your ticket and say in a comment WHERE your patch/PR is. > > > > This was the policy before issues on GitHub were enabled. > > Sorry, so what's your problem with GH-only that you're willing to light > yourself on fire over then?
I'm not willing to light myself on fire :) My problem with GH-only is the loss of history: we'll be browsing commits and finding links to still unexistent or completely unrelated issues, unless there's a plan to deal with that. Gitea is handling that correctly at the moment. > I'd like (as the RFC notes) to have one place for things. All the things. Gitea would satisfy these characteristics, right ? Uhm... wrong (this mailing list is not there) > I'd like that place to be the place where the developers are. All the > developers. This is a scary thought. > This is my position, nothing complex, nothing fancy. My vote will be -0 as I still belive in do-ocracy but please find a solution to the problem of cross-referencing commits to tickets as I think that has a value. --strk; _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
