Validity is only tested in the XY dimensions. So it's actually more appropriate that only the XY value is reported.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 7:35 AM Regina Obe <l...@pcorp.us> wrote: > Hi all, > > PostGIS geos310 regression test, detailed here: > > https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/5260 > > Started failing around October 18th. > > The test is this: > SELECT '#168', ST_NPoints(g), ST_AsText(g), ST_isValidReason(g) > FROM ( VALUES > > ('01060000C00100000001030000C00100000003000000E3D9107E234F5041A3DB66BC97A30F > > 4122ACEF440DAF9440FFFFFFFFFFFFEFFFE3D9107E234F5041A3DB66BC97A30F4122ACEF440D > > AF9440FFFFFFFFFFFFEFFFE3D9107E234F5041A3DB66BC97A30F4122ACEF440DAF9440FFFFFF > FFFFFFEFFF'::geometry) > ) AS v(g); > > > I'm guessing might be caused by this commit - > > https://github.com/libgeos/geos/commit/32348a68c5212c89cfefab46891d2b3aada4a > b40 > <https://github.com/libgeos/geos/commit/32348a68c5212c89cfefab46891d2b3aada4ab40> > which happened around the same time tests started failing. > > The difference from prior versions is that the 3.12 (main branch) now emits > for isValidReason one less coordinate > > Too few points in geometry component[4275341.96977851 259186.966993061] > > Instead of: > Too few points in geometry component[4275341.96977851 259186.966993061 > 1323.76295828331] > > > Which to me makes sense if we are only considering 2 dimensions for > validity. > > Before I change the test, I want to confirm that this is an intentional > change. > > Thanks, > Regina > > > > _______________________________________________ > geos-devel mailing list > geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel >
_______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
