Well technically LayerInfo does not have any of these attributes either. They all come from ResourceInfo, which is broken in terms of a resource-publishing split.
As for LayerGroupInfo it seems that this would indicate that it and LayerInfo should share come common super interface... I wonder if it makes sense to push all metadata type stuff into a LayerMedatadaInfo interface. And both LayerInfo and LayerGroupInfo could implement it. As for the issue with the current ResourceInfo... how would people feel about deprecating those methods and moving them to LayerInfo? -Justin Arne Kepp wrote: > +1 for additional configuration options, should act just like a real > layer in my opinion > > > Andrea Aime wrote: >> Hi, >> following up the request to show up a title and search on >> title, abstract and keyword on the map preview I'm wondering >> how to deal with layer groups, that have none of these >> attributes. >> >> I believe title must be added as a minimum, abstract >> probably too since the group is published in the wms >> capabilities as well. >> Keywords, hmmm... I could sum up the keywords of the >> layers making up the group, but maybe it's just easier >> to add the as a configuration option? >> >> Cheers >> Andrea >> >> >> > > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
