Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > >>> >>> As for the issue with the current ResourceInfo... how would people >>> feel about deprecating those methods and moving them to LayerInfo? >> >> I would be ok but there is one catch: WFS and WCS reference resources >> directly, so we'd loose the ability to build complete capabilities >> documents. >> > Right... but with a resource-pub split they should go through layer. So > perhaps we are not quite ready for this move. However... it may be > possible to just port the capabilities requests over to use layer. I > think (at least for wfs) that is the only place where the metadata is > really used.
A similar thing would happen for WCS, but we'd have to port over the DescribeCoverage output as well. Hum... what about workspace/namespace thought? Layers are not in a workspace. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
