> > If we go down this road, I'd say let's get the most out of it and > raname "configuration" into "data", "sample-data", "data-dirs". > > I guess seeing "data" into the name reminds people about the eventual > big amount of stuff they will be checking out there. > I don't know about you, but configuration just makes me think of > xml and property files, i.e., nothing big.
Yeah... but not sure how to get around this... our notion of a "data directory" tightly couples the two. I do think the name configuration does make more sense... since each directory does correspond to a "runnable configuration". But in the spirit of compromise what about "data-configuration" ? ;) > > Cheers > Andrea > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
