Hi all,
In today's IRC meeting we discussed how to move forward with regard to
documentation. At this point I think most people have agreed that sphinx
looks like the way to to go. So we focused more on logistics in the
meeting, in particular how to store docs in svn.
What we came up with as a compromise was to store them parallel to the
source and configuration trees. So it would look like this:
geoserver/
configuration/
...
geoserver/
...
documentation/
user/
developer/
Any objections to this structure?
David also brought up the good point that having the source tree called
"geoserver" is sort of misleading. So we brought up the possibility of
renaming it to "source". So the result would be:
geoserver/
configuartion/
documentation/
source/
Thoughts/comments/complaints?
-Justin
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
